English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

As I mentioned before, in Israeli media Internet websites it is possible "for any reader" to post a comment. Before is is posted, however, the commenter is "warned", that not all comments would be published, and "comments which are offensive or inappropriate would not be published". In http://ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-3332021,00.html there is an article about some "Russian spy" (in fact someone who happened to be from Russia, and has ties with "New Russian" Berezovsky-or some other "new Russian"-and probably with Chechen Rebels too), who was allegedly poisoned, maybe by Russia (maybe not, and I don't care). Inappropriate & offensive comments 12,14 & 15 call for the "annihilation"-God forbid-"of Russia". So why do people ask why the world is "sleeping" and doing nothing against Iran, and nobody asks why doesn't the world doing anything against the Israeli media?

2006-11-25 23:09:28 · 3 answers · asked by Avner Eliyahu R 6 in News & Events Media & Journalism

3 answers

It's not just the Israeli media that is the problem, and by the way there are some Israeli journalists who do NOT fall for the Zionist rhetoric. It is the entire Zionist-Israeli attitude that is the problem, and has been since the 1920s. This attitude is the cause of all the violence in the Middle East, and until this attitude changes there will be continued violence as a RESPONSE to Israeli aggression, terror, occupation and genocide.

The Israeli-Jewish-Zionist hypocrisy is that they view it as appropriate to call for the destruction of anyone else as their right of self-defense, yet if anyone does the same to them it is anti-Semitism (a catch-all Zionist phrase which is the cornerstone of Jewish racism) and a crime against Israel.

2006-11-25 23:22:05 · answer #1 · answered by Kokopelli 7 · 0 1

The question is clear enough but I cannot fit it into your comments about the Israeli press. Israel is a very insecure country and above all they try to protect their interests above all. Their lobbying efforts have served them well especially in the US. Many Mideast countries or groups call for the annihilation of Israel. I think it is mere propaganda to increase the insecurity of Israel. Comparing Germany with Iran is natural as anyone who is considered the evil one will be compared with Germany who is considered the evil. I know Hitler tried to eliminate all Jews because he considered Aryans the master race. The problem here is the Germans of Hitler were not the only evil. Considering how many Stalin killed and how many the Japanese massacred, Hitler looks like a piker. The real Aryans are the Persians, that is Iranians. This is also another link to the Germans but I have not heard Ahmandijad say Iranians are a master race.

2006-11-26 10:45:38 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

1. UN Security Council Resolution 242 calls on all parties to the conflict to negotiate a solution

2. It anticipates that Israel will withdraw to secure borders (not specified in the resolution) in exchange for peace guarantees from the Arab parties

The Resolution was carefully worded to require that Israel withdraw from "territories" rather than "the territories." This construction, leaving out "the," was intentional, because it was not envisioned that Israel would withdraw from all the territories, thereby returning to the vulnerable pre-war borders. And any withdrawal would be such as to create "secure and recognized boundaries."

It was widely recognized that the balancing of the ideas of a territorial return with "secure and recognized boundaries" for Israel would mean that Israel would not be forced to withdraw from 100% of the land captured in the June 1967 war. There is a dispute between the British-American understanding of the wording of the resolution and the French.

2006-11-26 15:11:24 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers