2006-11-25 22:54:24 · 9 answers · asked by Gooner 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Other - Cultures & Groups
Depends on the country or state.
Franklin and Elenore Roosevelt were first cousins. She didn't have to change her last name when she got married to him!
2006-11-25 22:57:09 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hi, I answer from Italy.
Under Italian law, first cousin marriages are perfectly legal and sound.
But from a social point of view, they aren't well accepted. In Italy most people thought that these are forbiden or that you need some permit from a court.
It isn't true, but that give you an idea on the public feeling about cousin marriages in Italy.
2006-11-25 23:28:17 · answer #2 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Marriage interior of a relatives is useful. we could take your inheritance. nicely while you're keeping it interior the relatives its not get unfold then. you hold your wealth and its not getting dispursed throughout. Your bloodline additionally keeps to be organic and relatives names final continuously. India nonetheless have many families working in direction of arranged marriages. they choose their toddlers in solid residences and who greater advantageous to take the final care than relatives. us of a of america is a melting pot. we are all diverse and there is not any choose for that style of necessity or practicality. right here we make our very own wealth and each and each era seems to have greater or much less regardless of what they grew up with. there is not any royalty or the Aristocracy so it would not count the place you're from or who your mom and dad are. Im not a supporter of inbreeding (kinda icky) yet Im in basic terms asserting why its user-friendly in India and different greater classic/conservative minded countries.
2016-10-13 03:29:52 · answer #3 · answered by cutburth 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not in the United States. And thanks to just such a happening back in the early 1900's in my family we now have a blood disease that causes all sorts of problems. Generations suffer. No they are not acceptable socially or medically.
2006-11-25 22:58:48 · answer #4 · answered by SZQBX 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
After about 3rd cousins, but 1st and second are way too close. Franklin and Eleanore, by the way, were 5th cousins, once removed.
2006-11-25 23:01:00 · answer #5 · answered by just browsin 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its genetically dangerous so just stick to having sex with your cousin for now.
2006-11-25 23:00:12 · answer #6 · answered by b-overit 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
some places yes and in others no it depends on th location,
2006-11-25 23:00:28 · answer #7 · answered by sickand tired 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
seriously there plenty of fish in the sea
inbred is wrong in all ways, its not what god intended, sicko
2006-11-25 23:00:47 · answer #8 · answered by justin-leigh s 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no
2006-11-25 22:57:25 · answer #9 · answered by tracy211968 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋