I am going to tell you why I think that the world is nearly being generated which I have been thinking about the problem for almost five years.
2006-11-25 22:25:56 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Education & Reference ➔ Words & Wordplay
No it's not grammatically correct, you have too many verbs, you have "am going" "tell" "think" "being generated" and "thinking." The rule is one verb for one sentence and one verb for a parenthetical sentence fragment. I told Bob, who lives down the street, about the party. (two verbs, but the verb lives is in a parenthetical fragment.)
The word "that" should never be used in a sentence unless you are saying, "I want that pen." .
The words "being generated" don't have a syntax. You can't use them without giving the reader a little more information. You need to give the reader more information so he or she can put it in a context they understand. (which is what the word syntax means).
And the punctuation needs a tweak. For example you need to use a comma before the word which.
You have two objects, world and problem and way too many verbs.
Lastly, events should appear in a sentence in the order they happened. So the first thing you should say is "For the last five years I have been thinking...."
You need two or three sentences if you want to keep both objects and all your verbs. The sentence you have now is not grammatically correct, but is easily fixed by breaking it into two or more sentences and by giving the reader a little more information about what you mean by "nearly generated."
2006-11-25 23:40:14 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No.It is not correct. The verb 'generated' is not fitting into the context.I assume from the word 'problem', that the word u mean to use is,'degenerated' ,which fits in ,to give a semblance of meaning, if the sentence is restuctured as:-
"I am going to tell you,why I think, that the world is nearly degenerated, which problem, I have been thinking about, for almost five years." The restructuring is done,using maximum number of words used by you.
2006-11-26 14:08:08 · answer #2 · answered by kcsadvocate 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is somewhat disorganized. "Generated is a verb that needs a "direct object." generated what? Let us rephrase the statement.:
" For almost five years, I have been thinking about the problem of how the world would be nearly regenerated and that is what I am going to tell you now.
2006-11-26 07:06:04 · answer #3 · answered by ? 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
nope for one what does the world is nearly generated even mean? u should start with I have been thinking about this problem for almost 5 years, then go from there
2006-11-26 06:37:35 · answer #4 · answered by FLeX_BoZaCK 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
you need a comma after generated an you need to put "which i have been thinking about this problem for many years. so it should look like this
I am going to you why that the world is nearly being generated, which I have been thinking about this problem for many years.
or you could put
The world is nearly being generated, which is a problem that I have been thinking about for many years.
2006-11-26 06:42:25 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
must be one big generator. no, not one sentence, I dont think, but then i speak english. Try, " I have been thinking about this problem for almost five years."
2006-11-26 06:37:28 · answer #6 · answered by loomis127 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
it doesn't make much sense.
but its not one sentence.
i am going to tell you why i think the world is nearly being generated. i have been thinking about the problem for 5 years.
2006-11-26 09:00:29 · answer #7 · answered by sumaravindran1958 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your question and its explanatory extension are not comprehensive.
2006-11-26 14:33:22 · answer #8 · answered by SRIRANGAM G 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ya
2006-11-26 14:25:56 · answer #9 · answered by doctor asho 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
what the heck !!!!!
2006-11-26 06:37:28 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋