CSR is all about companies playing a positive role in the communities they operate in. It can range from minimising the impact the company has on the environment right through to contributing to local charities and initiatives to help make the community a better place.
For example my company gives its staff a week off every year to do voluntary work which the company co-ordinates including everything from clearing waste ground, refurbishing community centres, spending time helping out in local schools with reading and writing practice, acting as mentors to young offenders - there's something to suit everyone.
Whilst I'm not naive enough to think that companies have an active CSR agenda for altruistic reasons, I think CSR is a win-win-win situation. The local community benefits, employees get the double feel good factor of volunteering and knowing they work for a responsible employer, and of course, the company's image is improved.
2006-11-25 22:24:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Corporations provide personnel for dealing with social issues within their community. It could range from taking responsibility for a section of highway to keep clean to fund raising. I am more familiar with the fund raising aspect. I have worked with a number of corporations on fund raising projects on such issues as ADA (American Diabetes Association), American Cancer Association, American Heart Association and a local Children's hospital. These corporate sponsors provide personnel and funds for these and other issues. The premise is that a corporation should give back to a community where it has been given so much. Many charitable organizations would not exist without corporate involvement.
2006-11-26 02:21:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by Flyby 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
it is the social responsibility that a company has towards the public. e.g. creating an ethical stance, to show to the public that they are environmentally friendly. They need to be accepted by the public to have any hope of being successful, it is their social responsibility. Like they could sponsor a school, or local charity, maybe even national if they are a large enough company. It is about keeping good relations with their stakeholders (people interested in their company)
2006-11-25 22:21:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by Sazi 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, i don't believe so. firms are in corporation, I repeat corporation, to make a income for their proprietors or stockholders. it somewhat is the muse of our capitalist society in this united states. this is been and continuously would be, till the socialist, liberals condemn us to a fashion forward for working for the government to facilitate the redistribution of wealth, so as that the non-contributors to the Gross national Product can proportion interior the wealth earned with the aid of people who artwork for a residing. Social accountability is the interest of government. consequently we pay taxes. firms at the instant are not in corporation to supply for the user-friendly solid. in basic terms study the form, you will see what this is all approximately. seem what befell to those firms that made social accountability a area of their ingenious and prescient and targets. They went abdomen up because of the fact there substitute into no return to their base line. the real definition of an entrepreneur is individual who places his call, recognition and his fortune in possibility to realize the reward of his labors, techniques and sweat. Why interior the international could he artwork to assist people who do not something to assist him? ultimately, who's to assert what area(s) are worth of helping? All stockholders are being taxed on the earnings from their investiments, why could they be taxed extra with the aid of getting a company wherein they have inventory contirbute greater to a social reason? Charity is a individual difficulty. Why could stockholders be required, circuitously, to assist motives wherein they don't believe? working example, Abortion on call for as against life, unfastened the killers or death penalty, alien scientific care as against paid helath coverage, union save as against precise to artwork? this would bypass on continuously.
2016-10-13 03:27:26
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
A bunch of lies coupled with bullshit, made up by low paid employees with studies in law and psychology and promoted by well paid executives who do not believe a word of what they’re promoting
2006-11-25 22:14:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hmmm.....i prefer Soli's social responsibilty.....mwahahahahaha
Soli
2006-11-25 22:24:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by Solista 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Click the link for everything you need to know - my employer is big on this kinda stuff.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_Social_Responsibility
2006-11-25 22:19:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
a form of tax avoidance which involves lying to the poor
2006-11-25 22:15:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋