http://video.msn.com/v/us/msnbc.htm?g=a2d820fd-2c8c-465f-a775-fdf11588befa&f=00&fg=copy
2006-11-25 20:59:32 · 10 answers · asked by Ringo G. 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yes. That guy in the video has many good points. Bush just isn't a very bright man.
I only hope that Iraq can live peacefully within itself in time.
2006-11-25 21:25:18 · answer #1 · answered by Zabanya 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The start was different, the middle isn't the same, and the end isn't the same, therefore different war.
The start was different because the Americans attacked a country that wasn't having internal conflict.and they conquered the capital and the army surrendered.
The middle was different because the Americans destroyed the beauracracy in Iraq and let anarchy reign for quite a long time. They had no plan on how to run the country after they had conquered it. By the time a beauracracy was established the local population had already divided into various factions.
The end was different because after they left Vietnam the country was united, after they leave Iraq the country will be having a civil war.
2006-11-26 06:50:12 · answer #2 · answered by Bad bus driving wolf 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Unfortunately it is being played out as such which is why we must withdraw, we invaded under false pretenses, after the public was convinced by the leadership of the US and Great Briton that wmds existed , and that Iraq had something to do with the 9/11 attacks, nothing was farther then the turth. Iraq is in the midst of a full blown civil war, which we can not stop, nor should we refferee. Meanwhile the real purps of 9/11 continue to remain free from harm or charges
2006-11-26 05:04:32 · answer #3 · answered by paulisfree2004 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I actually think Vietnam had more meaning than this war. At least then we trying to rescue the communist takeover of a viable country. We had no good and just reason to enter into this conflict in Iraq. No WMDs and they were NOT responsible for 9-11.
2006-11-26 05:04:51 · answer #4 · answered by tamwagon 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, we didn't use napalm or agent orange in Iraq. The rest looks eerily similar. Even the end, when people finally admit there is no "winning"....for anyone.
2006-11-26 07:48:09 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes
Australia supported USA in both these wars.
And USA lost both of them.
So next time we must think.
2006-11-26 05:16:14 · answer #6 · answered by MAJ 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
A fast forward.
2006-11-26 05:46:49 · answer #7 · answered by J.SWAMY I ఇ జ స్వామి 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh yeah
2006-11-26 05:01:05 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. The question istself is left wing scare tactic.
2006-11-26 05:03:45 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
If it looks like a duck..
2006-11-26 05:01:33 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋