Were the 9/11 Attacks Carried out by the U.S. Government?

Question

If you say or think No, Please look at the evidence, I dont have enough room here, As My limit is 1000Characters Max.

If you have a few minutes , Please take a few minutes and goto my info I placed on my profile, Goto
http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=76296974&blogID=160409200&MyToken=d272b46a-c2c5-461d-bde9-3d338f2d7b32


Please go over this very valueable and important information, this will be the most important info you ever read in your life.
Dont wait 60 years for this to be declassified.

Thank You for your time


It also says why the govt would kill its own citizens, One reason is to Scare americans to give up there right in exchange for "security" when you will just get tyranny and a police state.
Also to pass laws such as the military commisons act, and patriot acts.

Answer 1

Yes! in the 9/11 attacks the government of U.S.A was indirectly responsible due to its faulty policies.

These Islamic terrorists created many Islamic terrorists websites and this became the mode of communication between various Islamic terrorists and Islamic terror groups. The happening of 9/11... the episode of the twin World trade towers is the result of weariness of this Islamic terror groups... one of which is headed by Osama bin laden.


Osama bin laden spent the most of his time fighting against the erstwhile USSR and even got six months of training by CIA in its headquarters. He was a pure creation of the American fundamentalists regime. After the proxy war with the erstwhile USSR was over after its downfall... Osama bin laden was refused any help and recognition from the United States of America. He was infuriated... he pledged retaliation which resulted in many air strikes in the USA during the 9/11 episode.

Can we still blame Osama bin laden and his group of Islamic terrorists for the 9/11 WTC episodes? Osama bin laden is not to be blamed... the total blame lies upon the comment of the United States of America and their allies who failed to take care of Osama bin laden and his trusted brand of Islamic terrorists who had fought the erstwhile USSR on behalf of the USA.


We only reap what we so... nothing more or less! To put the blame on Osama bin laden and his team of Islamic terrorists is pure eyewash for the citizens of America. If the citizens of United States of America have chosen military commanders and their president who are not willing to disclose the truth and only truth to the masses at large... they are to suffer in the end as they have suffered in the 9/11 WTC episodes. Why blame the innocent!

Any Human Being who truly suffers at the hands of a mighty government and that too the superpower number one of the World... it becomes extremely difficult for one to Forgive and forget! The total Teachings of Forgiveness and compassion were laid bare... these innocent Human Beings need food and clothing for their families to survive. They were not only betrayed but also stabbed in the back by the army might of United States of America. No balm was applied on the wounds of the so-called Islamic terrorists rather the American soldiers rubbed salt on their wounds. The so-called Islamic terrorists cried in pain but to vain! More here- http://www.godrealized.org/what_is_the_cause_of_islamic_terror.html

Answer 2

While it does appear that the twin towers were mined, this does not mean that the government did it. For months prior to 9/11 the cleaning crews were going in and out of those buildings. How many of those humble workers were sleeper Muslims who could have planted the explosives?

Why are you so quick to blame Uncle Sam? There are less paranoid possibilities to explain the evidence.

Answer 3

nicely, history and diverse info help the conspiracy concept. nonetheless one might by no ability become conscious of for particular. I surely have long previous throughout the time of the link presented. I in general agree different than the certainty that any hydrocarbon gasoline, inclusive of aviation gasoline could have flame temperatures [in ambient air] upto approximately 1980degC = ~ 3600 deg F, sufficient to soften any and all metals used in plane. [ I m a metallurgical Engineer, pal - specialized in Furnace and combustion kit]- nonetheless accomplishing that style of temperatures on the steel itself is somewhat complicated, nonetheless no longer impossible in open ecosystem. to function: Pearl Harbor [W W II] too is seen a SELF attack via many. there have been comments- circa 1984-eighty 5 of a team of researchers- into purely declassified conflict records- having stumbled upon records suggesting " eastern Admiral became paid hundreds of thousands human beings$ via US govt companies- to attack Pearl Harbor" & that " maximum ocean worth & combating extra healthful ships were bumped off already from the harbour ahead of the attack, abandoning especially dud ships" The researchers- approximately 10 in style disappeared quickly after, their unintentional dying obituaries hidden in the interior columns. i do no longer see why and what else could have delivered on the eastern to ask u . s . a . to conflict? and not stick to this so- referred to as crippling attack via an expeditionary tension ? nicely, you will in basic terms surmise. No proofs consistent with se. opposite or SELF assaults- pupils of miitary and political technology could throw extra mild on the importance of those.

Answer 4

The U.S government did not plan the attack,

however, they might have had an idea something was going to happen, and did not take the proper steps to prevent it.

Were they carried out by the U.S Government, HELL NO!

Answer 5

Yes!


regards,
Osama bin Laden

Answer 6

All the arguments made by 911 'truth' theories have been shown to have either flaw or flat out wrong here http://www.debunking911.com/index.html.....

Would you like examples?
911 theorists say hijackers are found alive, but BBC article they mention actually is about validity of hijacker's ID. They apparently have stolen someone else's ID. Criminals stealing IDs? Hard to believe? BBC article ends by saying FBI is now seriously doubting 'IDENTITIES' of hijackers.

Building 7 had giant hole stretching over 10 floors and its picture exists, but conspiracy theorists probably don't want you to see since it dampens their 'demolition' theory. See the photo here. http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm...

People said things like 'pull people out of there,' but conspiracy theorists says 'pull' is technical term for demolition.

Despite the claims about bombs going off, nobody ever confirmed it. Interviews usually include people saying 'I heard what sounded like bombs' as floors began slamming down one by one sequentially. Again, people's comments are taken out of
context and taken literally by 911 theorists. Quotes in conspiracy theory websites in many occasion include just a phrase or single sentence and if they are viewed in its original paragraph its meaning totally changes because of context.



Small assumptions like those above may not seem like big deal, but you get hundreds of lies like that and soon you have big mountain of conpelling evidence for far out theory.

Answer 7

I read that Israeli intelligence was following Atta and other terorists. One small town where the terrorists were staying so were Israeli agents.

Answer 8

I haven't read the site yet but I always have a suspicion that it's possible! You never know.

Answer 9

go watch v for vendetta--- it was the whole idea... terrorism...then police state...gosh we havent had a revolution in awhile, seems like we should hop on that

Answer 10

Bloody quit posting this already.