Darwin was a man who tried to find answers, he touched on some things but for the most part he was all wet.
I have gone to the Zoo's for years and still have not seen any Apes,monkeys, or donkeys for that matter turn into a man. That is ridiculous. And the thought that anyone would believe that is silly. After 6000 years there has been no reports of the event of transformation of an ape, etc., turning into anything resembling a man. So why bother reading about that old fossil Darwin?
There are new scientific studies made and they directly link us to that meteor that sits on this planet that came from somewhere else in our galaxy (they think in this galaxy) but who knows, do you?
2006-11-25 18:59:02 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
I have read the book and evolution does not stop it is a constant. But has anyone read Einstein? We all know the dates of 30,000 and 6000, but the question is are you content just believing with blind faith or have you read recent studies and by whom? This is a friendly query for research.
2006-11-25 19:15:02 · update #1
People still insist that Darwin was right for the same reasons that they believe in the Bible. People obviously need something to believe in. They just simply cannot accept the fact that everything is meaningless. If that is, in fact, the case with this world. Although it does not seem as such...I myself am still undecided.
2006-11-25 19:30:57 · answer #1 · answered by third_syren_of_seduction 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
What scientific studies link us to meteors?
Charles Darwin was one of the first people to challenge the thinking that we evolved from Adam and Eve, and there are still disbelievers.
But how do you explain dinosaur fossils?
How do you explain Cro-Magnon fossils and other human-like skeletons found buried in the earth and/or embedded in stone?
If there is an intelligent design to the universe, humanity and all things natural, then studying the theories of Darwin or other evolutionists can only lead us closer to the truth of the matter. Disputing it without examining it is foolish.
2006-11-26 03:19:21 · answer #2 · answered by Methuselah 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋
people believe Darwin because it is what they choose to belive. It is not proven and is not disproven. Any idea that can be a possibility that has not been disproven or proven will attract many poeple. Look at religion it can not be proven or disproven. So why do you believe that one religion is right and one is wrong. I myself don't believe in evolution but i do accept the fact that it is a possibility. I do believe in God and I have chosen a belief system. If evolution is right it doesn't conflict with my beliefs and if it is wrong it doesn't conflict my beliefs so I have chosen to not believe. I belive two things:
1.what is proven
2.what I choose to believe that is not proven or disproven.
So choose and let others choose.
2006-11-26 04:46:10 · answer #3 · answered by yoophglup 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hahaha, learn the time frames that evolution took place in too. 6,000 years is not long. how about, say, 30,000 years? 30 MILLION!?? Then talk to a Darwin-studying person. I would fail to believe that miraculous clay turned into a living, breathing THINKING human some, say, 10,000 years ago.
Studies have shown that there was a meteor that hit our planet, but hey, it may have been in this galaxy... I would also fail to believe that they know EXACTLY where it came from. It may have been from our neighboring galaxy Andromeda!
2006-11-26 03:04:57 · answer #4 · answered by Cold Fart 6 · 4⤊ 2⤋
You shouldn't talk about things you know nothing about. Apes do not turn into people, If you anything you would know that Darwin never said that. The process of evolution takes millions of years.
2006-11-26 03:03:56 · answer #5 · answered by October 7 · 7⤊ 1⤋
Good observations. You spent 20 years looking at apes when it took millions of years to evolve from "ape-like" primates. NOT FROM APES.
Science, science, science.
The facts are that ALL the evidence points to evolution. In fact, NO evidence points anywhere else.
2006-11-26 03:03:04 · answer #6 · answered by dawnsdad 6 · 9⤊ 1⤋
You obviously haven't bothered reading the works of "that old fossil" Darwin, or you would understand gradual change. You are just rattling off meaningless gibberish. Please write coherently and know what you are asking about. There are numerous craters of Earth. Are you refering to the Chicxulub Crater?
2006-11-26 03:15:01 · answer #7 · answered by novangelis 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Cause what he said made more sense than something that has no evident origin and convieniently drops from the sky.
2006-11-26 11:33:01 · answer #8 · answered by Saffren 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
because he still is. read the book. it doesn't suggest the things that you speak of. it doesn't say that any animal gives birth to another species.
every careful observation of (almost) any animal shows evolutionary changes over the last six thousand years and much more dramatically so over the last six million.
2006-11-26 03:08:14 · answer #9 · answered by karl k 6 · 6⤊ 0⤋
People still insist that Darwin's theory is accurate because it is. Only the ignorant would disagree.
2006-11-26 03:07:40 · answer #10 · answered by Rockin' Chrissy 2 · 4⤊ 1⤋