in terms of a romantic mate? should one follow the heart or the mind or both?
2006-11-25 18:32:23 · 6 answers · asked by zentrinity 4 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
Passionate & poor with problems>with passion you have everything,being poor makes you thrive to stay alive and
better yourself and solving problems well if you got this far
the majority of your problems will have been solved
2006-11-26 09:47:10 · answer #1 · answered by bumble b 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither, I would rather be rich, passionate,stable and help the poor if I can and there is always security within oneself without money, but the security and passion makes you successful enough to become someone of substance and means.
2006-11-26 02:43:15 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'll take the passion, I have lived without it and it blows. Ideally, though, one would have both, or enough of each.
2006-11-26 03:07:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ever watch Star Trek?
I dont know how the Leonard Nimoys of the galaxy continued to exist.
"Honey we must procreate to perpetuate the Vulcan race"
"Yes, you are right, lets's have sex after dinner for optimal performance"
"Okay, I have no objections"
"Good I will see you in our chambers at 8 pm"
2006-11-26 02:45:05 · answer #4 · answered by -.- 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
im a practical person, i like passion, some security and stability...and yes..passion...and although i can provide myself security and stability in life, i like my man to earn more than me to avoid any insecurities on his part....
2006-11-26 03:04:04 · answer #5 · answered by ♦cat 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
definetly the passion,,life always has problems
2006-11-26 02:40:45 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋