A) It was an Inside Job.. US GOVT Masterminded the operation
B) US GOVT Partipated In the 9-11 attacks, But didnt mastermind em
C) There is a cover up of 9-11
D) They have told the us complete truth, No cover up.
2006-11-25 18:11:56 · 12 answers · asked by Bush is not a chistian 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I believe something between C and D... With A and B, you are putting a lot of faith in a bunch of people not leaking anything and I find that hard to believe, especially today where anonymity is so easy to achieve.
The only reason I say between the two, it the government ALWAYS has secrets (and I don't have a problem with that).
2006-11-25 18:13:50 · answer #1 · answered by Aegis 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I choose C as well. I don't believe that the "bombs in the buildings" or "fly by wire aircraft" stories are true. The WTC were built differently than other buildings. Most of the weight of the structure was supported by the outer shell, so the significant damage to it and part of the internal truss structure caused trusses to collapse. When enough trusses collapsed, the building would have experienced a failure in the tension needed for the outer shell to stand. It crumbled at just one point, naturally, and then collapsed straight down.
They play on a number of misconceptions. There is no reason why a tall building will not collapse into its footprint. Knocking down a building is not like knocking over a lego. Think about it - tonnes of steel, all supporting huge weight. A particle made a free projectile will fall straight down - why shouldn't interlocked bits of steel, none of which can support the weight above, do the same?
Also, steel does not have to "melt" to sag - it becomes structurally unsound at far below its melting point.
Yes, I believe it's possible there was a conspiracy because it's challenging to believe that airport screening AND the military would both completely fail on one day.
2006-11-26 05:58:30 · answer #2 · answered by jacinablackbox 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely I believe in a cover up. I refer you to this video which everyone should see. If you watch this whole video, and still believe the Government had nothing to do with it, then you have no common sense. Anyone who knows anything about structural steel buildings especially of the calibre of the trade towers knows they cannot just crumble into powder without explosions. The steel was cut in perfect 30 foot pieces ready to load on a truck and cart away to China real quick so they could not be analyzed. Do your homework people. Only all of us spreading the word can save the world. Much war ahead if we do nothing and this will happen again!
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-6708190071483512003&q=911+demolition
2006-11-25 18:54:23 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
C, as while some evidense suggests governement knowledge or participation, nothing can be proven until the whole truth comes out! However there is enough evidense to prove that some one has covered up major parts of the attacks. That someone or agency is obviously in the intellegence community of the US
2006-11-25 21:18:05 · answer #4 · answered by paulisfree2004 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
(C) This is why i choose (C). Back in 1963 the United States Government came up with a plan of terriosm that they were going to use on the United States citizens. The reason why is because the United States wasn't getting along with Fidel Castro and they were going to use it for a reason to invade Cuba. Well that plan never came to be but the knowledge was still there on how to cause terriosm in the United States. All of our presidents since then have known about these plans but it only took one president by the name of Bush to follow thru with the plan (911) and to you use it for the reason to go into Iraq.Sadamn Hussan wasn't the whole reason we went into Iraq.Our own President and our government are responsible for 911!
2006-11-25 19:14:57 · answer #5 · answered by michele k 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The earth is flat and the moon landing was done on a Hollywood sound stage and Britney Speers never really got married because she was saving herself for Elvis. Anymore questions?
2006-11-25 18:15:06 · answer #6 · answered by BlkJac 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
It will become believable when facts are presented. Until then, the burden of proof lies upon the prosecution
2006-11-25 18:20:54 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
ummm if u look into and watch a movie called ummm loose change u can find it all over the web it has a bunch of proof tht bush did it
2006-11-25 18:20:32 · answer #8 · answered by Chris(Seung Sun) 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
D) No cover up.
2006-11-25 18:13:39 · answer #9 · answered by foogill 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
D. no cover up!!!!!!!
2006-11-26 07:43:15 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋