2006-11-25 16:07:16 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
I'd say bill w is crazier
2006-11-25 16:08:50 · answer #1 · answered by Howdy 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Walking Barefoot on Coal.. Extremely Hot!
As For Naked We Humans Are All Naked It's not Wrong!
2006-11-25 16:08:29 · answer #2 · answered by Brian 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Walking naked in -20 weather for a mile.
2006-11-26 02:08:47 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Walking barefoot on hot coals for a mile
2006-11-25 16:11:04 · answer #4 · answered by ▒Яenée▒ 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The first
2006-11-25 16:08:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
walking naked in -20 weather for a mile.
2006-11-25 17:51:40 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would have to say walking naked. Walking on coals only affects the feet, the other affects the whole body.
2006-11-25 16:09:56 · answer #7 · answered by kepjr100 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i would say the coals for a mile. -20 degree weather naked would kill you, while you would simply lose your feet after waling on coals.
2006-11-25 16:08:58 · answer #8 · answered by Eugene 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
id be saying both.. but if you walked barefoot on the coals and then walked in the cold weather.. that would at least cool off your feet !!!!!
2006-11-25 16:58:34 · answer #9 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the naked walk. coals will only burn the feet, 20 below is frost bite all over the body
2006-11-25 16:09:56 · answer #10 · answered by Donnie B 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I easily have tried the two my my bare ft. walking a mile in spite of the undeniable fact that i might pick the snow. sometimes sand can get fairly warm, I as quickly as confident a fireman who became into along with his brigade practise on the coastline to hold me around the nice and comfortable sand so my ft does no longer get burned...he became into my hero. reckoning on the thickness of the snow i might probable take them off and circulate barefoot if i could.
2016-12-10 16:11:55 · answer #11 · answered by bremmer 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋