Nah, but I'd consider stealing it from him!
2006-11-25 15:45:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by Mental Floss 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, you shouldn't automatically assume that. Maybe the person hit a downfall and ended up on the street(hey, it could happen to anybody) and already owned the bike. I really don't like it when people automatically judge less fortunate people as dangerous and disloyal. They're human just like everyone else and deserve a chance. Just think about it, it could be YOU out there.
2006-11-25 23:46:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by brieseptember 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. I assume that people are stupid enough to give a homeless, who is most likely NOT homeless money, and he goes and buys that expensive bike because he has nothing else to spend that money on in the first place.
2006-11-25 23:44:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by Brittany W 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
If he's got an expensive bike, maybe he's just pretending to be homeless for free cash and/or food! O.O
2006-11-25 23:44:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by JimJim 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
How do you know theyre homeless or a street person, unless you ask?
2006-11-25 23:47:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by Mintjulip 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I wuoldn't say that. maybe the homeless person can't afford the gas prices
2006-11-25 23:47:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by lavehargett 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nope I'd be happy for him because then I'd know not to give him any money like the other poor saps.
2006-11-25 23:46:41
·
answer #7
·
answered by Mrs. Butler ♥2 B♥ 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
thats like asking a welfare mother if shes ripping off the government when she gets into a mercedes benz
2006-11-25 23:46:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by BoTToms UP 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
i would assume they stole it unless they are homeless cause they spent all their money on it.
2006-11-25 23:43:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by barrelracer12 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
if you are 100% sure they are homeless then yes otherwise you cant be sure
2006-11-25 23:50:39
·
answer #10
·
answered by dreamer36 1
·
0⤊
0⤋