2006-11-25 15:38:24 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Beauty & Style ➔ Other - Beauty & Style
Obviously, saving the environment.....if we keep poisoning the environment, eventually there will be no living.....period.
2006-11-25 15:40:38 · answer #1 · answered by mysterymardi 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As we all r living for our self and we r not understanding the real fact that v have to save environment it is more important to save environment
2006-11-25 16:21:18 · answer #2 · answered by cRaZy cReAtIoN 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
More important is saving the environment. It keeps our own generations happy. We (I) are not leaving for 60 or 100 years, but we live for ages on this earth. Our imagination and vision must have such outlook on life on earth. ('I' is merely a feeling and not real as 'mine' is there and leaving all 'mine' 'real 'I' comes out. The earth and the Universe is mine and it is my birth right to protect and save it. This is the words from yore as lives are resting in a body for a little period and it takes another body like how we change our dress. Standard of Living is decided individualy and there is no scientific base for 'standard of life'..
2006-11-25 20:40:15 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Definitely saving the environment!
2006-11-25 16:10:46 · answer #4 · answered by Andromeda18_ 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Saving the environment, so that we have a place to live.
Duh.
2006-11-25 15:42:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There can be one answer to both question - that is by encouraging governments to give priority and support to industrial tree plantation/reforestation projects.
"Make money with the poor people" while planting trees and helping renew the environment.
So that question of yours need not be an either or issue.
2006-11-25 15:43:32 · answer #6 · answered by Manueldatu 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
increasing the standard of living.
2006-11-25 15:41:17 · answer #7 · answered by George K 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
both go hand by hand
2006-11-25 19:34:42 · answer #8 · answered by riti 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋