English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

well since we all know that those two sides cannot be reconciliated i was thinking in the wises thing we could do which would be cutting the baby on half , do u agree ???? would this be the wises thing to do ??? or does any one wants the child ???

well since the pro- choice think the all woman has the right to chose whether or not she wants to have a baby and the anti-abortion think the baby has the right to live even if he is not wanted or the result of a rape i was thinking on pleasing both sides . how ???

well i think that since the anti-abortion groups do want the baby i think what we should do is to give them the child from day one , to them or to people who cannot have one , by removing it from the person who doesn't want to have a baby to a person who wants one or is prochoice . i want to add that all the pro-choice self-proclaimed would be given a baby even if she doesn't want it which i really doubt .

2006-11-25 14:04:46 · 12 answers · asked by game over loves evanescence 6 in Pregnancy & Parenting Pregnancy

what do u say are u pro-choice or anti-abortion ???

2006-11-25 14:05:46 · update #1

and what do u think of this idea ???

2006-11-25 14:08:57 · update #2

make all anti-abortion substitute mothers .

2006-11-25 14:10:53 · update #3

i obviously do not want to cut the baby on half but i wonder if the anti-abortion want the baby or not , they would have to raise it .

2006-11-25 14:13:24 · update #4

i would support all anti-abortion and every one who cannot have a baby to raise the child from day one aka = insert the bbay into anti-abortion women .

2006-11-25 14:18:11 · update #5

if i want to take the choice away from a woman then i do not have the right to chose wether or not i want the child .

2006-11-25 14:20:58 · update #6

why don't i see anyone from the anti abortion movement saying yes i want the baby ???

2006-11-25 14:45:38 · update #7

12 answers

Interesting idea. But I dont know if the person, expecially if raped, would want to undergo surgery to remove the baby. If it is early they could take a "day after" pill or a pill before a certain stage of pregnancy to abort the child w/o surgery. I would consider myself pro-choice. I dont have children, and would like one, so therefore would not have an abortion at this stage in my life, but I can think of too many situations where i wouldnt blame a woman/girl for having one. Think about incest, rape, incestual rape, or pregnancy at an age where your body could not handle giving birth without risking your own life!

2006-11-25 14:15:22 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I'm sorry im completely against abortion...even if its because of a rape...theres a lot of girls out there young girls who've been raped carried the child on and took care of them...i know its hard and its physically and emtionally a complete breakdown but if you think some 16 year old girl can do it then why cant a 30 year old woman do it that has a really good job and a nice house/....the rape thing is overrated....even if they could remove the baby...from one person to the next it would proably die because that persons hormones arent built up enough to help the baby survive so it'd proably end in a miscarraige...thatd be a good idea if it could work....i dont think cutting the baby in half is going to do anything but kill it so once again thatd just be killing it and what good is that going to do for people who are making the babies nothing they learn absolutely nothing other then when i have a problem i can get rid of it.....

2006-11-25 14:09:32 · answer #2 · answered by cutenwild1769 5 · 0 2

I have a question to your question. If it is "chosen" for a woman to get pregnant and she should give birth...then if it is "chosen" for a woman not to be able to get pregnant should she be allowed to adopt...please think about it. If you believe that it was meant to be to become pregnant and getting rid of the baby is wrong then the other side should be that if you were not able to bear a child would it be right for you to take anothers into your life.


OK now if you are not ticked off enough...I believe that if you have a choice the choice is one between YOU AND GOD. and NO ONE else has a vote. I personally believe that with all the children in the world that most would only adopt the clean and "acceptable."

2006-11-25 14:05:40 · answer #3 · answered by ஐAldaஐ 6 · 0 0

I don't really get what you are asking. There isn't a way to make both sides happy. If you o smeone you know is having a baby they don't want it s up to them to choose whihc way they would go. It really depends on the girl. If she doesn't want the baby but doesn't want to kill it thenyeah shes most likely going to give it up for adoption or to a family member. If she doesn't want the baby and doesn't want to be pregnant and she can live with herself after having an abortion then she'll have an abortion. Me myself even if I didn't want my baby I couldn't kill it. Though I do think if for some reason a woman made the choice to have an abortion that would be her own business. Yes it is selfish becuz there are people out there that would kill for a baby. But then again it wasn't my choice. My choice is to do my very best to be the best mother I can possibly be. I understand its hard its really hard. But there are people out there that will do it for you if you can't. You gotta love your baby enough to do whats best for it. I unno if that answered anything you asked but thats my opinion on the subject.

2006-11-25 14:20:12 · answer #4 · answered by Kimi is 31 weeks 1/7 w/#2! 3 · 0 0

First of all until the fetus is born it's not a baby so cutting it in half is a moot point. Besides cutting a baby in half would be murder. You obviously have no clue as to what pro choice is since you equate it with pro abortion. Pro choice is being for the woman's right to choose whether her body is to be an incubator or not. If she chooses it is to be used as an incubator then she has the CHOICE to raise the infant (it's not a baby until it is born), herself with either with or without a partner (again her CHOICE) or give the baby up for adoption. So maybe it's best if you don't go on risking looking totally undereducated until you learn a little something about both sides of the question.

2006-11-25 14:10:09 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Pro-life. There are an over supply of people who want to adopt new babies, even Down's syndrome and handicapped ones. If there were not, there are many specifically pro-life people who would be willing to take and care for all babies not being produced. You should wait for there to be a problem before you act as if there is no solution.

2006-11-25 14:12:01 · answer #6 · answered by chilixa 6 · 0 2

If the girl dose not want a baby then have her tubes tied.
I she is raped then carry it to turm and give it up for adoption.
There are plenty of people out here that can not have children for several reasons they would be more than happy to have the child.

2006-11-25 14:09:01 · answer #7 · answered by Hardtimes 2 · 0 1

it particularly is this way of sturdy question. i presumed-approximately this myself for years. i've got confidence Jesus would be professional- decision, no longer professional-Abortion. there are various circumstances in the Bible the place Jesus gave human beings the choice to chosen their movements, he in no way imposed his will on them. He continuously instructed thoughts of folk with a similar impediment in front of them and the techniques that they made on the tip. the solid Samaritan tale dealt with picking to help somebody in desire or no longer too. He instructed the prostitute to bypass and sin not extra. He did no longer condemn her for her movements, yet telling her her decision exchange right into a sin and she or he shouldn't do it. yet he did no longer rigidity her to take only one decision. Even on the tip of his human existence, he permit Judas make the call of betraying him. He in no way compelled absolutely everyone to do one action. Jesus continuously gave his suggestion and understanding on a controversy, yet he in no way compelled them to act one way. Jesus exchange into extra disillusioned concerning the church being in the corporate of turning out to be money and doing sinful issues, and that they are assume to be the church. on the tip, Jesus would say "Love your Neighbor as your self", which a lot of human beings certainly do no longer do. The question is that if a human existence somewhat the size of a shrimp justify as a neighbor. If we aren't assume to break existence: what approximately conflict, antibacterial cleansing soap, and the insecticides. How far can we bypass? My perception is he's unquestionably professional-decision. Jesus would have confidence in the call of your decision. each and every decision would have its effects and purely GOD can say if it exchange right into a impressive or incorrect decision. that decision will come after your existence no longer until eventually now.

2016-10-04 09:05:44 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

If you're serious, then seek medical help. If you're not serious, seek medical help.

2006-11-25 14:14:17 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You go, Solomon!

2006-11-25 14:06:37 · answer #10 · answered by Minmi 6 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers