Be as creative as you want.
2006-11-25 13:16:41 · 19 answers · asked by Team Jolie-Pitt Aniston 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
The world would be....
1. So noisy- even at nightime you'll hear cats and dogs chatting or shouting against each others.
2. Some people aren't get boring 'coz they can talk with their pets.
3. They can protest against any goverment.
4. Thay can "talk back" if you're not good to them... poor hunters!
5. Hmmmm... Birds can sing with lyrics... So you can request any song to them.
2006-11-25 13:24:48 · answer #1 · answered by Ashlyn_47 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The world would be more in order because the animals would tell us to just eat, f**k, and sleep like they do. They'd tell us we're too complicated. And I think they'd be a little appalled. I wonder if there'd be a jack*** for president.....
2006-11-25 13:19:38 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wow, I'd ask my dog everything he knows about another dog from smelling its pee. He'd be able to tell me a whole lot. We could have a long chat over coffee even.
2006-11-25 13:22:28 · answer #3 · answered by Tuna-San 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The world would be truly delightful, as was this question. And, there would be a lot more vegetarians!
2006-11-25 13:39:44 · answer #4 · answered by Lola 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It would be scary as hell. Do you have any idea what I have done in front of my animals?
It is happening already! Has Snookums been talking to you -.-!?
2006-11-25 13:34:25 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That would be fun. I'll ask a goldfish his thoughts for the day. Teehee.=()
2006-11-25 13:24:01 · answer #6 · answered by Sherbet 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Then alot of people would rather keep pets than get married.
2006-11-25 14:47:44 · answer #7 · answered by Saffren 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We'd finally know that dogs bark because their owners masturbate in front of them.
2006-11-25 13:41:29 · answer #8 · answered by -.- 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There would be more people with pets and alot less peeing in the house.
2006-11-25 13:19:00 · answer #9 · answered by DJ 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A lot more confusing.
2006-11-25 13:27:32 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋