Like North Vietnam = bad, south vietnam = ally, North Korea = bad, south korea = ally...
kinda ironic dont u think?
2006-11-25 12:12:13 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
What does america have anything to do with countries spilliting communist? America attacks the communist countries AFTER they become a communist government...
and no this has nothing to do with america splitting...
2006-11-25 12:36:19 · update #1
Every side thinks god is on their side, north south east or west. I have a Nazi belt buckle that says "Gott mit Uns" on it. Since you all had your dig at the Confederate states, go research this bit of news: slavery was only outlawed by the US Government during the civil war IN THE CONFEDERATE STATES, it was still legal to have slaves in many northern states, including Lincoln's home state of Illinois, until some years AFTER the war ended. Let us know what you find out. Might want to look into who hanged who in the race riots in New York too, by the way and when that occured. Bad South, Good North, we learned that in school, right? Ever hear that the victor writes the histroy books? Oh my.
2006-11-25 21:31:21 · answer #1 · answered by hfsi@flash.net 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Oh yes, I guess you are talking about America.
There is a north America and there is a south America. And I am saying that under your (absurd) theory, we, South America are 'the good side'.
PD: Look at your question: You never ask for a "communist splitting", you asked about north countries usually being 'the bad side'.
You call the United Stated "America", but America is the whole Continent, from Canada to Argentina.
Kind of ironic don't you think?
There are many ways of dividing.
There are also many ways to be 'the bad part', not only communism. Racism maybe is the worst.
2006-11-25 12:14:14 · answer #2 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
nicely... The South's were given each and every of the rednecks with the shotguns and stuff, so that they'd likely arise the following on ATVs and shoot at us. We, in spite of the indisputable fact that, ought to you ought to load the little guns we've. yet in spite of the indisputable fact that, the South's were given DC and the President and Congress. i'm wondering they could declare warfare and the President ought to pull the troops out of Iraq and produce 'em to the North, yet that they'd likely turn on the President. it could be a sturdy wrestle, i'm wondering the North.
2016-11-26 22:08:23 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Umm...bad generalization
Civil War : Good guys=North
Racist Trash Treasonous Rebels =South
2006-11-25 17:06:35 · answer #4 · answered by RER 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
There is nothing either good or bad.It is a matter of how you take things.Those who live in south are not all good and all those who live in north are not all bad, and vice- versa.The country may split horizontally or vertically.
2006-11-25 14:01:48 · answer #5 · answered by Ishan26 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
How about the Civil War in the USA. The north was good and south was bad; for slavery......
the north won.
2006-11-25 14:17:41 · answer #6 · answered by pixles 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
That's not always true, those are just two examples. What about the American Civil War? (Please don't answer that if you're from South Carolina or something and you support secession) Also, goodness and badness are relative. As Americans we are taught to fear nations such as North Korea and North Vietnam and see them as the bad guys, when really we are the ones who attacked them.
2006-11-25 12:16:09 · answer #7 · answered by Kostya 2 · 3⤊ 4⤋
It wasn't that way in the Civil War!
2006-11-25 15:14:57 · answer #8 · answered by a_phantoms_rose 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I had never thought of that before. It may have something to do with magnetism.
2006-11-25 18:53:13 · answer #9 · answered by Jim T 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Why is it when a country splits America's dirty paw marks are somewhere around it?
2006-11-25 12:17:04 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋