2006-11-25 08:37:02 · 10 answers · asked by gabino_dm 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Mythology & Folklore
There is not more of one than the other they are balanced. Evil is more noticeable. Those who do evil are always more out there than those that do good. Those who do Good have no need to be noticed
2006-11-25 08:53:51 · answer #1 · answered by raven blackwing 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes, I believe so. And the reason for that is because it is easier to be evil than good. It is easier to destroy, destruct, disassemble rather than maintain, build, hold together.
Take a domino show or a house of cards for an example.
It takes painstaking deliberate dedicated work, effort, & skill to put this fragile creation together. It takes much time to finish. But to wreck it takes no real work, effort, or skill. And it is VERY VERY quick in comparison timewise to tear something apart.
How long did it take to build the World Trade Center & how much work did it take?
How long did it take to crumble the World Trade Center & how much work did THAT take?
People are more apt to do things wrong than do things right when you get down to it. Regardless of what you say to yourself & others when not in the heat of the moment...when you are faced with the crossroads right in that heat you will make the wrong decision more times than you will make the right decision. The Jelly on the fallen PB&J sandwich tends to be on the Evil side. That's what hits the floor first.
It is BECAUSE the world's more evil than good that good is lauded & applauded. That's because it is rarer.
John Lucas
2006-11-25 17:44:29 · answer #2 · answered by johnlucas31320 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. There is more real than Ideal. That's all. The ideals of good and evil are fairly black and white, but the world really isn't black and white. There for all those grey things get dumped in the evil side by stupid people...so superficially I looks that way.
Don't worry, things are not as evil as they seem. XD
2006-11-25 20:02:33 · answer #3 · answered by Free A 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"There seems to be six views on this subject. 1) Man is inherently good, 2) Man is inherently evil, 3) Man is good at heart but superficially evil, 4) Man is evil at heart but superficially good, 5) Man is a contradiction of good and evil. 6) Man is a developmental construct - neither good nor evil."
2006-11-25 16:39:05 · answer #4 · answered by A Friend of Cooper 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It does seem like it.
All good things come from God. He intended that we have a world which was "Good". "Evil" is the absence of God working good and working good through people.
Since more people would rather NOT follow God, we get to see more evil.
2006-11-25 16:43:28 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe it is what we put out energy into. If for good purpose, we'll have good. If for evil purpose, then evil will result. Gives us something to think about regarding Iraq, huh.
2006-11-25 16:39:30 · answer #6 · answered by beez 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, But because evil is more noticeable and more domineering then good it create a illusion of being greater of the two................
2006-11-25 20:02:56 · answer #7 · answered by kilroymaster 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes
2006-11-25 16:44:13 · answer #8 · answered by lordkelvin 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO Two thirds of the angels stayed with God!!
2006-11-25 16:39:07 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no.
If seven billion people were really out to do everyone else in, we'd really be in trouble!
2006-11-25 16:44:28 · answer #10 · answered by kent_shakespear 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋