English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

or are ou like me. i think he did it. please express your opinion on this situation!!!

2006-11-25 08:04:52 · 10 answers · asked by littleme 1 in News & Events Media & Journalism

10 answers

not in a heartbeat
the jury did not want more riots in LA
nor personal reprisals

2006-11-25 08:07:29 · answer #1 · answered by tom4bucs 7 · 0 0

OJ was thoroughly investigated, tried in court and had the evidence evaluated by a jury who found him "not guilty" of this crime. He has always maintained his innocence of this deed and he wrote a theoretical book (which does not contain a confession). Money not narcissism was probably the motivation in writing the book as there is a civil suit debt and a need to provide an inheritance for his children etc. The trial attorney's Cochran, Marcia and Darden wrote their own books and received millions.
A few things that the jury may have considered:
-The investigator who found the glove later committed PERJURY regarding his extreme racist comments.
- Another investigator took a vial sample of OJ's blood from the lab and carried it INTO the crime scene.
- The glove DID NOT fit OJ's hand (wrong size).
- There never was the amount of blood on OJ's body, clothes, house or car CONSISTENT with someone who had committed that crime in person..
- The murder weapon was NEVER connected to him or found.
- The jury was taken to visit OJ's house and DID NOT see the rumored large blood trail.
- There were no witnesses to the actual crime.
- Likely the jury found him innocent because there was a LACK of real evidence to convict.
Some may disagree with the verdict but it's unfair for them to blatantly say with a certainty that this man is guilty.
At times a publisher controls the general content and even the title of a book which an author must agree to if he needs the contract

2006-11-26 18:56:42 · answer #2 · answered by sunshine25 7 · 0 3

Of course he did it, look at the fainting faces of he and cocren when the verdit was read, they almost passed out cause they new he did it and were sure he would be found guilty, and if it wasn't oj what motive was it for someone else

2006-11-25 10:19:13 · answer #3 · answered by xyz 6 · 0 0

He did do it. There was DNA evidence to prove he did, he just wasn't convicted because the evidence was handled poorly & the prosecution made mistakes...beside the fact that the entire trial became about race.

2006-11-25 08:07:30 · answer #4 · answered by lop 3 · 0 0

There are not many people who think OJ did not do it.

2006-11-25 14:36:50 · answer #5 · answered by pixles 5 · 0 0

OJ is as guilty as hell. They just didn't want riots in HellA.

2006-11-25 08:08:58 · answer #6 · answered by FireBug 5 · 0 1

YES, I guess money does talk. Very Sad for both familys.But that is ok he will have to answer to something much bigger than himself some day. :) You can bet on that.

2006-11-25 08:47:37 · answer #7 · answered by Summer :) 3 · 0 0

He's as guilty as used toilet paper.

2006-11-25 08:14:43 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

GUILTY

2006-11-25 08:35:24 · answer #9 · answered by chefbill 3 · 0 0

he did it and admitted it

2006-11-28 01:02:32 · answer #10 · answered by laney45 4 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers