Since he's suppose to be publishing a book about what if he had killed nicole, does this change your view on if he did do it or not?
2006-11-25 07:56:14 · 11 answers · asked by DD 2 in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
OJ is a man who was thoroughly investigated, was tried in a court of law that was presided over by a fair judge and had the evidence evaluated by a jury who found him innocent of murder. He has always maintained his innocence of this deed and he wrote a theoretical book (which does not contain a confession). Money was probably the motivation in writing the book as there is a civil suit debt and a need to provide an inheritance for his children etc. The trial attorney's Cochran, Marcia and Darden wrote their own books and received millions.
A few things that the jury may have considered:
-The investigator who found the glove later committed PERJURY regarding his racist comments.
- Another investigator took a vial sample of OJ's blood from the lab and carried it INTO the crime scene.
- The glove DID NOT fit OJ's hand.
- There never was the amount of blood on OJ's body, clothes, house or car CONSISTENT with someone who had committed that crime in person..
- The murder weapon was NEVER connected to him or found.
- The jury was taken to visit OJ's house and DID NOT see a large blood trail.
- There were no witnesses to the actual crime.
- Likely the jury found him innocent because there was a LACK of real evidence to convict.
Some may disagree with the verdict but it's unfair for them to blatantly say with a certainty that this man is guilty.
At times a publisher controlls the general content and even the title of a book which an author must agree to if he needs the contract.
2006-11-25 12:15:29 · answer #1 · answered by sunshine25 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
It does not chage my point of view on Mr. O.J.
He is still a liar and a killer!
His conscious was eating at him that way he came out with the interview and the mystery writter(on the book) If I did It?
His the only black person inhistory that ever beat murder!
Thank God 4 Johnny!!!
2006-11-25 18:52:32 · answer #2 · answered by thinkpink4u101 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The book will not be published by the original printer...
Nobody who was sure of his guilt before has changed their mind. He is an insane megalomaniac and I'm glad they canceled his interview and stopped distribution of his insulting book.
2006-11-25 16:00:45 · answer #3 · answered by Clarkie 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I always thought he did it, cause Johnny Cocharan had such a big line of bull.
2006-11-25 22:36:06 · answer #4 · answered by pixles 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who's OJ?
2006-11-25 16:04:01 · answer #5 · answered by Whoa_Phat 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I thought he did before, I really think he did now.
2006-11-25 15:57:36 · answer #6 · answered by Bignizz66 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
i still think that man is guilty as sin. however i dont necessarily expect others to agree. its just my opinion
2006-11-25 15:58:38 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Is there anyone in the world that doesn`t know that he`s a double murderer?
2006-11-25 16:04:01 · answer #8 · answered by Hamish 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It doesn't change anything, I've always believed he's guilty.
2006-11-25 15:58:41 · answer #9 · answered by UNITool 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
he's still trying to wash the blood off his hands
2006-11-25 16:00:57 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋