2006-11-25 07:32:06 · 11 answers · asked by Austin 2 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
I think there probably should be. Michigan seems to me to be the only team with much of a shot at beating Ohio State.
2006-11-25 07:47:04 · answer #1 · answered by Paul P 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I answer this question with caution, since I had given my opinion to a question earlier regarding USC, and I think that Yahoo is a USC fan.
In my totally biased opinion, I think that Ohio State and Michigan should be playing for the national title. You say, 'why should they play again, they already played?' I say that the two best teams in the country should play for the national title every year, and Ohio State and Michigan are the two best teams in the country this year, regardless of their rankings; BCS, AP, Harris,etc.....
Texas has lost, twice...Auburn has lost, twice...Florida has lost, to Auburn...USC has lost, to Oregon State (very unranked)....Arkansas has lost, twice, to USC ( B I G ) and to LSU..... ND has lost very........ V E R Y...... B I G to Michigan.....in South Bend ( that's where Notre Dame plays )....Rutgers, West Virginia, Louisville and Boise State .....I shouldn't even have to mention......
Bottom line, Michigan lost to Ohio State, who has been # 1 all year (including the preseason) at OSU, by 3 points.....if that doesn't merit a rematch ( on a neutral field ), then you are a fan whose team is trying to get into the national title game, or, you just don't want to see the best two teams play for the national title.
I won't fault anyone, ever, for being a fan of their team, I never have. If you have a favorite team you should defend them, always, but, if your team isn't one of the two best teams in the country, then you should be happy that the two best teams in the country are playing for the national title.....
PLEASE, don't root (or RANK) against a team just because you don't like them. As fan of college football you should always want to see the two best teams in the country play for the national title, each, and every year. That is what the BCS was created for, to end the arguing amongst all fans throughout the country, and crown a true national champion.
2006-11-25 08:16:45 · answer #2 · answered by Dave C 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
ABSOLUTELY NOT!!!!!! now i will admit that i am a true Ohio State fan, and the thought of a rematch scares me, but even if my favorite team was someone else, Michigan already got their chance to take down the #1 team and was unsuccessful. It is time to let someone else on the field.
2006-11-25 08:02:44 · answer #3 · answered by nickm257 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No I don't feel that it would be fair to anyone outside of Michigan to watch another game between these two teams.
I feel that the outcome of the first game was evidence enough that Michigan cannot beat OSU. Now I don't know if anyone else can either, but the rematch would not be very entertaining to the majority of the US population.
2006-11-25 07:35:54 · answer #4 · answered by Frank 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
no, of course not. They won fair and square. If there should be a rematch, shouldnt there be one for the rose bowl, and every game should be 2 out of 3? And if that happened, it might expand to 3/5 and so on. You get the point. NO.
2006-11-25 07:36:56 · answer #5 · answered by that fishing kid 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
There always is, every year. I am a Michigan fan who did not see the game. Even if I believed Michigan got screwed, a re match would always be more unfair than the original. Always.
2006-11-25 07:45:22 · answer #6 · answered by bob h 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
well it all matters on the Notre Dame/USC game. if USC loses i believe that there should be a rematch, it was a great game.
2006-11-25 07:39:29 · answer #7 · answered by Tony M 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No they had their shot and lost.
2006-11-25 07:48:31 · answer #8 · answered by 10 to 20 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
no go usc
2006-11-25 07:33:38 · answer #9 · answered by kevlar t 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No.
2006-11-25 10:22:43 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋