Career stat comparisons: FG % - Nash: 47.7 %...Iverson: 42.1%
3 PT % - Nash: 42.1%...Iverson: 30.9%
FT % - Nash: 89.6%...Iverson: 77.7%
Assists - Nash: 7.2...Iverson: 6.2
(Here's one that Iverson leads) Turnovers-Iverson- 3.7, Nash-2.4
The only thing Iverson does more of than Nash is get tattoos and cause problems for his coaches and teammates...and that crossover dribble?...Hell, he's carrying the ball half the time... Iverson is the most overrated player in NBA history
2006-11-25 07:19:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Steve Nash is better than Iverson right now. No doubt about it. He's been league mvp for 2 straight years now. He makes everybody around him play better, and it doesn't matter what team he is on. If you don't believe me, look at when he went to the Suns a couple years ago. Ever since then, the Suns have gone deep into the playoffs. And he improved the whole team, look at Marion, Raja Bell, Borris Diaw, and Amare's stats. Plus, he is like always the league leader in assists, and he averages at least 15 ppg. And he can also be a dominant scorer if you have seen him play in the playoffs. In my opinion, he's the best pg in the world right now.
Iverson is not as great as Nash, but he is still an amazing player. He just needs a better supporting cast. He is usually one of the top 3 scorers in the league, and he is so fast. He's got a nice touch on the ball too. But right now, I'll give the better player to Nash.
2006-11-25 05:56:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by hey 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Michael Jackson is 10 years older than Allen Iverson and grew up in Gary Indiana vs AI in Virginia.....They did not got to high school together.... Anyway, AI is better than Steve Nash. Nash is just on a team with more than 1 player who gives any effort.
2006-11-25 05:46:12
·
answer #3
·
answered by Albert 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
NO Allen Iverson didn't go to the same school with Micheal Jackson.
1. He went to Bethel High School which is in Hampton,VA where he was born and raise
2. Micheal Jackson is like 17 years older then A.I.
3. Micheal Jackson was born in Gary, Indiana and raise there until he moved to california
Anywayz I think that Allen Iverson is better then Allen Iverson because last season he was number two in the league with the most shots. Plus he gets the most points in a game on his own. Allen is one of those players that you got to keep your eyes on because he doesn't seize to amaze you.
2006-11-27 15:01:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by Angel 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
That's tough cause Iverson averages 30 pts but shoots 20+ shots but he plays great defense.Nash scores 20 pts. but he gets 10 assists per game which could count for another 20-30 points which is 10 or 15 more points than having A.I.,so probably go with Nash he is a much better team player and good role model.
2006-11-25 06:00:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by nhuntamer 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
That's a hard question. Allen Iverson definitely has the best crossover I've ever seen. Steve Nash is less selfish with the ball. (I don't think either went to HS with Michael Jackson considering he's a good 15-20 yrs older than either of them.)
2006-11-25 05:42:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by Ice Cream 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Steve Nash, he's a winner and unselfish. Iverson's a ball hog, even I could score 20 points if I took 50 shots a game.
... yay i agree with this because nash is just a good team player... btw nash is 3rd in assist in the nba all time
2006-11-25 05:52:36
·
answer #7
·
answered by Banky 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Allen Iverson is a better scorer. Steve Nash is a better point guard. They both play two different positions, so you cannot say who is better than who.
2006-11-25 07:23:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by Malik V 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Steve Nash, he's a winner and unselfish. Iverson's a ball hog, even I could score 20 points if I took 50 shots a game.
2006-11-25 05:44:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by Zeeshan V 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
iverson is NOT OVERRATED in fact u guys are cussing him so much when he already has improved his fg% for last season...and also he averages like 7 assists per game now and thats not too bad so SHUT UP about him being a ballhog...i dont hate steve nash or what and in fact i admire his court vision...anyway you just cant compare these two players together they have their own strengths and weaknesses and both of them are great players in my opinion...
2006-11-26 14:47:59
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋