English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

artillery shells hit a house and a car wounding 2 people.
It went on to say in 2000 they had a intifada uprising when they carried out freguent attacks.
But since the cease fire seen a sharp reduction. But are now threatening to have a 3rd intifada.
That sounds so ridiculous to me. If Canada fired a rocket into the USA blowing up a house and car and wounding two people.
They would be up in arms and start an all out war.
Then they had people coming into the USA and blowing people up in freguent attacks. What would the USA do?
then after a cease fire the attacks were less freguent but didn't stop.
During all this Israel is the bad guy because they retialate???
What would the USA do?

2006-11-25 05:28:43 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Current Events

That was an illustration. I am not saying that the USA have anything to do with Israel. I am just saying if the palistians want Isreal to leave them alone stop blowing them up. Gee, don't you see that would make someone mad.
Why do you think it is ok to kill others but you get mad if they retialiate.
Some guy beats me up you think I won't get even with him?

2006-11-25 13:37:15 · update #1

7 answers

'He who lives by the sword will die by the sword', how true are those words? if nobody took up arms against anybody else, including retaliation, then there would be no wars. Fortunately soon all wars will be a thing of the past.

2006-11-26 18:37:35 · answer #1 · answered by Frax 4 · 0 0

Why do not the Israelis enable the Palestinians have fairly dignity? They take care of them like animals. i'm completely on the edge of the Palestinians - the peace agreements shop failing because of the fact of strikes on the two components...... e.g. Israel comply with end settlement, whether it keeps. Israel has an identical opinion to maintain crossings open, yet then they close them, and the scientific help help promised is a lie. Israel have been condemned for their human rights abuses, conflict crimes, and for focused on civilians. seem on the unequality in the two components, are the two gently matched? Tanks and missles against abode-made rockets? And is it proper that 15 Palestinians die very very nearly on an prevalent basis as a results of Israeli incursions? What could u do if u had tried to barter with an enemy that continuously breaks its delivers?

2016-10-13 02:20:59 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

What you are not realizing honey is that USA is the only country that is supporting Israel. Without US veto Israel would have a sharp trade barriers and all other punishments by the rest of the world. That includes Europe, Middle East and some third world countries.
There are so many moves by other countries to take action against Israel but because US does not allow them they cannot do any thing significant.

2006-11-25 05:40:04 · answer #3 · answered by Sam P 2 · 2 0

Palestinian militants fired a rocket in Israel. Two peoople were injured.

Israel launches an offensive into Gaza. 150+ Palestinian civilians, mostly women and children, are killed.


This is what happens, consistently. It's obvious who the real culprit is. And it's not the Palestinians.

2006-11-25 09:40:14 · answer #4 · answered by Link 5 · 1 0

What has the USA got to do with it? Israel's problems are Israel's problems. Take it up with them. If they ever want to be taken seriously as a legitimate state, they're going to have to stop whining and act like it, instead of acting as if they're a colony of the US and entitled to special consideration and protection.

2006-11-25 07:08:59 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

you are mixing apples and oranges, we have no such problems with the canadians

2006-11-25 12:46:18 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Couldn't agree with you more.

2006-11-25 05:32:57 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers