That is why in the 1950's, the average American family lived fine on one income. Today the average American family needs TWO incomes just to get by because the progressive income tax (the second plank of the Communist Manifesto, we might add) has sapped the earning power from the main male breadwinner and women in the workforce has lowered his earnings. Women in the workforce and feminism therefore are government tools for creating more Taxpaying Slaves for The State resulting in the enslavement of the average American family unit.
2006-11-25 04:55:29 · 3 answers · asked by WORD UP G 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
NO ONE makes U get married !!!!!!!!!
NO like it = NO get married ... seems simple enough.
The reason ppl need two income to exist.
1. GREED - desire for a higher standard of living
2. World economy - rehab after WW2 & 3rd world involvement
3. Woman seeking equal economic power
4. Corruption ... taxes are NOT bad if the majority of it is place back into society. The problem is cronyism stealing through No Bid Contracts.
USA standard of living will continue to erode due to stupidity and globalism.
Solution:
1. More Politial Parties
2. Stop importing slaves and establish tarriffs
3. Prevent women from working if children under 16
4. Establish 40 work week
5. National health care system
6. Educate the stupid
7. GOV regulation and adoption of GREEN energy policy
8. STOP making fake wars.
2006-11-25 05:24:48 · answer #1 · answered by Genuis by Design 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
And until the revolution comes, taxes will rise, as will prices. This is human nature in a Paper Based Fantasy economy.
What makes a Dollar a Dollar, and why is a British Pound more pennies than a US Dollar. Because we are told to believe that, and the funny part is, we do.
Ask yourself, as I ask myself daily, what do I have that I cannot live without.
Then I make a sammich with a $5 bill.
2006-11-25 05:10:05 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is wise. Why could i could like the earnings I make under a undeniable variety be taxed on an analogous fee using fact the earnings I make above it? i elect a number of my earnings to pay for foodstuff, clothing and shield. something is for luxurious and then mark downs and investment. that's the utmost precedence? So why tax bigger priorities on an analogous fee than decrease priorities?
2016-12-29 11:34:09 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋