FDR did NOT pass such a law. As a result of FDR breaking the tradition set by George Washington of not running for a 3rd term, The 22nd amendment to the Constitution was passed. It states that 'No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice.' The only provision that MAY prevent such a person from being elected Vice President is the 12th amendment. The last sentence of which reads 'But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States. It is interesting to note that while the 22nd amendment prevents a person from being ELECTED to the office of President more than twice, the Constitution does not specifically prohibit a person from Serving as President more that twice.
2006-11-25 13:56:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by STEVEN F 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. The 22nd Amendment says, "No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of President more than once." (It says nothing about consecutive terms!)
A Vice President's primary job is to become President if the President dies or becomes incapacitated. If s/he can't be President, s/he can't be VP.
FDR did not pass this law. It was ratified two years after he died. The president takes no part in amending the Constitution. And besides, what President would ever pass a law limiting Presidential power?
2006-11-25 07:29:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The short answer is yes.
To be Vice President, you have to be qualified to be president, according to the 12th Amendment. (http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.amendmentxii.html ). The potential roadblock is the FDR-era change that you reference.
But actually, FDR (a Democrat) did not pass a "law;" the Republicans at the time pushed for a Constitutional Amendment (not a law) that limited the president to two terms (the Twenty-Second Amendment; see here: http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.amendmentxxii.html ).
However, the 22nd Amendment only bars the ELECTION of a president to more than two terms; it doesn't prevent someone for running for Vice President, or even being APPOINTED to the position of VP. So, under the 25th Amendment, http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.amendmentxxv.html , Clinton could become the VP if the vice presidency were vacant (say, if someone else was VP and then they resigned).
Thus, there are several ways Clinton could be the VP, and if the president resigned under any of those scenarios, again under the 25th Amendment, Clinton could actually be President again.
2006-11-25 03:34:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by rd211 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
I really wish people would read the constitution. A president cannot be ELECTED to more than 2 terms in their lifetime rather it is consecutive or not. Now technically looking at it the vice presidents position is not voted for so in that manner of speaking yes he could serve as vice pres and become pres if somthing happend to whoever the pres is because then he would not have been elected into the posistion. The other way of looking at it from some peoples point of view is that when you are voting for the pres you are also voting for the vice pres. Which by law they are not so legally speaking yes he could serve as vice pres and become pres again if somthing happend to whoever the pres was.
2006-11-25 03:36:10
·
answer #4
·
answered by trl_666 4
·
4⤊
0⤋
According to the Constitution, to qualify as Vice-President one must meet all the qualifications to be President. Clinton, having served his two terms, is no longer eligible. There is an unresolved issue of whether he could still be Vice President, but be passed over in the line of succession. My feeling is no. If he can't be President, he can't be Vice President.
Hardtimes is wrong. A Constitutional Amendment states that a President can serve two terms, and up to two years of a term started by another President if he succeeds to the office, but taking a term off does not wipe the slate clean. A two-term President CANNOT serve another term if he takes a term off. He is ineligible.
2006-11-25 03:31:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by kreevich 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
First off, FDR did not pass the law. It was an amendment passed by the American people years after FDR died. FDR ran four times, he was quite opposed to the idea of term limits.
He can be VP. The 22nd amendment applies to the election of Presidents, not their appointment. So, if he becomes VP and the President dies, he can serve out the remainder of the term.
2006-11-25 03:40:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by jerry 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
FDR didn't passed that law. A republican-controlled Congress did after he died. Clinton can't be VP since there could be a possibility of him becoming president if something were to happen.
2006-11-25 12:40:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by cynical 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bill Clinton could be vice-president. If he were to become President again, he could only work for two years. The limit for President is two terms or ten years total. Of course, he only worked about two years of his past two terms.
2006-11-25 03:37:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by damndirtyape212 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
No because he could not be elevated to the Presidency in the event of a vacancy. And FDR didn't pass laws, that's Congress' job.
2006-11-25 05:47:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
You beat me to the punch with the aid of ONE 2d, Henry. The shape states that no you would be able to be vice president who would not fulfil the standards to be President. As somebody who served 2 words, he's ineligible to be vice president on the grounds that he's not eligible to be President. yet another clause of the form says that the President and the vice president won't be able to stay interior the comparable state. it somewhat is why Cheney, who substitute into residing in Texas, relocated to Wyoming formerly the 2000 election. bill and Hillary are the two criminal citizens of ny State.
2016-10-13 02:13:13
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋