2006-11-25 03:18:52 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
StevI have no theory yet. But many questions. Such as why this particular poison? It is not the usual method of killing. Where would someone obtain this material? I would think it would have to be state sponcered
2006-11-25 04:31:14 · update #1
juandos I have no motive other than my curiosity -thanks for the link though.
2006-11-25 04:35:17 · update #2
Last night I saw a more detailed explanation of what killed him and honestly, it made my blood run cold. A pin prick of this killed him? I think someone in our Homeland Security needs to do some serious large-scale possibility scenarios. They didn't really address that possibility on the program I watched, but it was the first thing that occurred to me. Hopefully it isn't a weapon that lends itself to mass scale use.
2006-11-25 03:27:13 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Once again the Liberal Media has bought stock in future News.
The cause of death should have been classified, kept secret. But the News Media saw the opportunity to give HOPE to every potential dirty bomber.
If a pin point speck can kill even the people that handle the body. Terrorists must be shouting allah akbar this morning. Thanking God for FOX NEWS
Go big Red Go
2006-11-25 12:46:09 · answer #2 · answered by 43 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Interesting way to look at it. I guess it may have well as been a nuclear bomb that felled him. Actually, I find your definition very clever.
The Ivans were ALWAYS very good at espionage; probably better than any other intelligence agency.
Whether it was the KGB, or today's FSB, the Russians place a premium on stilling those that seek to expose their state secrets.
America could take this recent event as a lesson.
2006-11-25 11:30:23 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
it wasnt a nuclear bomb. It was radioactive material.
I say it sounds like a russian thing to do. Especially since russia has spent so many decades trying to produce a believable democracy, while everyone rightly assumed they were truely communist. They cant risk someone possibly shedding ligth on the truth of their false democratic government. Even if it is failing on its own and in plain site of all the rest of the world.
2006-11-25 11:21:09 · answer #4 · answered by amosunknown 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
He isn't the first spy to be so treated, but certainly interesting that a method so calculated to be a big media story was employed.
2006-11-25 11:22:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Are you suggesting how the poison was administered?
Interesting. Can you add to your theory?
2006-11-25 11:22:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Is this incredibly stupid question posed for some reason that you've yet to explain?
Have someone read and explain the following story to you: "Who killed Litvinenko?"...
2006-11-25 11:55:26 · answer #7 · answered by juandos 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
are you objecting to killing their own erstwhile spy? or the method?
it is a normal practice (killing) for all the countries.
read the book/novel shibhumi.
2006-11-25 11:30:52 · answer #8 · answered by charlatan 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
That is crazy. I would love to be a government spy.
2006-11-25 11:21:12 · answer #9 · answered by neilinhp 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
By a what? Thank you very much while your up!
Things happen that probably shouldn't.
2006-11-25 11:25:08 · answer #10 · answered by producer_vortex 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋