English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Me, personally, I don't think so. I think they need a new designer and a new choreographer. There songs are OK, but I really think that the lead singer should let the other girls have a chance to since a whole piece.

So what do you think of them? Do you think they have talent? Why or Why Not?

2006-11-25 02:20:59 · 40 answers · asked by Vanessa<3 5 in Entertainment & Music Celebrities

Like the lead singer has a good voice, but I really think that she should let the others have a chance.

2006-11-25 02:27:26 · update #1

40 answers

thye act like hoes

2006-11-25 02:21:39 · answer #1 · answered by Luis 4 · 1 1

I think the lead singer can sing-that is why she is the lead singer because she got the voice. But, she may not have that much appeal to her unless she is surrounded by others. That is why she is in a group. I think as a group their voices are minimal. That is why the others are there for added sex appeal. Now, one by one, they may not generate the voice that the lead singer has but, they generate enough to plausibly be a group. And, with productions and some dance routines and catchy beats, they actually make a good girl band.
I mean, like the boy bands-N*Sync, 98 Degrees, etc.-there was always 1 particular member of the group that sounded better then the rest.
So, my conclusion is this: they have minimal talent when it comes to singing as a whole. The lead singer-with more time-may prove to be good alone if she ever plans to go solo. The only thing-besides their lead singer-that is keeping them on the charts is their sex appeal, their looks, their dance routines and whom they collaborate with as well as the production values.

2006-11-25 03:00:23 · answer #2 · answered by uchaboo 6 · 0 0

The whole point of having a group like that is having a lead singer to stand out...Any group will have all of them singing parts of the song.
I thnk they have some talent but are by far NOT the most talented group out there.
They are dressed pretty par for the course when it comes to that type of music. I think they were all go go dancers or something before they became famous.

2006-11-25 02:39:11 · answer #3 · answered by Becky R 3 · 0 0

It's your opinion but I have one too and it's not right 2 diss a group of talented girls.
YES they might not sing lead and i think that's wrong they should all get a to sing @ least a few lines. Destiny's Child they all got to sing and I don't really like Nichole that much cuz she wants the spot light 2 much she's already gone 2 do other songs wiv artist such as Avant, P.Diddy..... I think it's 2 early 2 go off from the group.

2006-11-25 02:30:27 · answer #4 · answered by tickgal88 3 · 1 0

for me, i honestly dont know. on one hand the lead singer has an amazing voice and their songs HAVE been very catchy and sung all through the nation. but on the other hand i agree, i do think they need a new designer because some people could get a little upset with what they think they're selling (example: they wear bows on their butts). and yes the other girls in the group should have a chance to sing. it could go either way.

2006-11-25 02:24:54 · answer #5 · answered by ♫ninja_turtle♫ 3 · 1 0

"Yes, but the one girl was high in the music awards the other night, she tripped over the chair, was out of synch with the others."

She didn't trip over it, she dropped it, and I doubt that she was high. They were OK at the AMAs anyways.

I'd say the Pussycat Dolls are just OK, but they're just really wearing skimpy clothing. Nicole should let the others sing, but the choreography is fine to me.

I wouldn't think they're whores or anything because we haven't actually met them or see them do any Paris-Hilton action yet. Although they dress like they are though. But I can't say they have talent because only one actually sings while the others dance. They're successful because their songs and them are hot.

2006-11-25 06:55:50 · answer #6 · answered by Banana Hero [sic] 7 · 0 0

..in today's industry "talent'' is relative and second to image.

The Pussycat Dolls were a conception of the record company they are on; audition were held with the criterion being 1) look good 2) dance and 3) hold a note.

The PCDs success can be attributed to the girls' looks and the producers' beats thus far. Surprisingly, lead singer Nicole does have a modicum of talent vocally; however, the material the PCD covers doesn't allow it to really be appreciated.

Perhaps once her solo debut (you didnt see that one coming) arrives, we'll hear her range fully.

hope this helps....

2006-11-25 04:44:15 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I think the lead singer can sing. I think the rest can keep with the choreography. The remainder of their act depends on production and marketing. As long as they keep to the stuff that works for them, I think they have all the talent they need.

I don't think you'll find them, as a group, doing anything that would be considered exceptionally challenging musically, or too far afield of the type of songs they do now.

2006-11-25 02:24:09 · answer #8 · answered by question_ahoy 5 · 2 0

I totally agree wit u that Nicole should have tha others a chance 2. Nicole can really sing!!! The girl Melody can really sing 2. But tha others they can DANCE!!!! So I think that Nicole should be solo and also Melody. Tha others should be like backup dancers or a profesional dancer.

2006-11-25 02:44:09 · answer #9 · answered by jamjelly999 3 · 0 0

Yes, but the one girl was high in the music awards the other night, she tripped over the chair, was out of synch with the others. Like many successful groups, they like to abuse substances - I think. I love the song Buttons - and that is what brought them the attention they have.

2006-11-25 02:36:56 · answer #10 · answered by phish_or_man 1 · 0 0

kind of. i think there clothes and songs r cool. but u r right about letting the lead singer give them a chance.

2006-11-25 02:23:04 · answer #11 · answered by wildfire224 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers