If the world record holder for the most world records has the world record for the most world records count towards his world record tally, because if it does then the second place world record holder would have to get an extra world record to take the world record for the most world records, thereby gaining an extra one by virtue of the fact that he had just become the world record holder for holding the most world records?
2006-11-25 02:07:03 · 5 answers · asked by olliehunt 2 in Education & Reference ➔ Trivia
er... ye i agree
2006-11-25 02:12:47 · answer #1 · answered by jak 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Didn't understand the details, but the holder of the most world records is someone with a Guinness book of world records in their hand..
2006-11-25 02:10:59 · answer #2 · answered by dark_rose287 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
i dont think of they're gonna advantages themselves in basic terms cuz they carry the international record for itemizing the main international information if that's a record e book besides and that they are meant to hold international information, so wat's the factor? :P
2016-12-13 13:58:02 · answer #3 · answered by montogomery 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Shoot, i forgot this one, i know that he was a male, with glasses and he done things like farthest distance hopping on a po-go-stick, and i think he got 11 records
2006-11-25 07:56:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I'll say jackie chan as far as I know he's broken every bone in his body at least twice
2006-11-25 05:10:38 · answer #5 · answered by eddy r 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋