It probably depends on the context to some extent. Retentive behaviour probably relates to the unwillingness to change things. Traditionalism, as believed by the Tories perhaps. It sounds like the sort of thing that a patronising left wing feminist might say. The Blair government is always banging on about modernisation, as though we were all living in a place called 'the past' and we all need bringing up to date. What they really mean, is that they want to change things and they need an excuse. To describe all men in that way is clearly ridiculous. It implies that all women are not like that. Pure rhetoric, said for effect.
2006-11-25 03:28:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by Veritas 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
obsessesed with the most minor of details. usually overly clean. like Felix Unger from The Odd Couple or Phil Hartman's "Anal Retentive Chef" character fromSNL
2006-11-25 00:55:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Is this in query to an article purportedly written by the celebrated reclusive American writer and poet, Linda J Cirillo?
2006-11-25 01:01:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Thats so funny - Jason, above is right. My husbands name is Jason and he is very anal-but I'm working on him. Maybe it's a Jason thing?! Was the guy in the article named Jason too?
2006-11-25 00:57:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by Scorpio 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
obsessed with a routine or obsessed with details to the point that he would pursue the routine/details at the expense of what he knows to be the right set of choices.
2006-11-25 01:26:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by mikesheppard 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Anal retentive? Freud?
2006-11-25 00:56:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by E B 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
someone who is obsessed with a particular habit, not just men, this relates to anyone.
2006-11-25 01:59:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by glasgow girl 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
man acts like a a--
2006-11-25 00:56:20
·
answer #8
·
answered by sonoftazont 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Obsessive with detail.
2006-11-25 00:55:36
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
i guess they meant he acted like an *** but could'nt print it that way
2006-11-25 00:58:56
·
answer #10
·
answered by freebird 4
·
0⤊
0⤋