English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Please can you answer this question

Ben M

2006-11-24 22:19:29 · 8 answers · asked by Tha Virus Slayer 1 in Arts & Humanities History

8 answers

Swords.

2006-11-24 22:20:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

There were several. Swords of course....There was the broad sword whcih was a double edged sword with a wide thick blade about 3 feet long used as a thrusting and hacking weapon. There was a long sword, a narrower double edged blade about 4-4 1/2 feet long again a hacking weapon. There was the bastard sword which had a blade longer than the broad sworde but slightly wider than the long sword, combining the best attributes of both the other two weapons...hence the term bastard.

There were several varieties of pole arms, spears were always popular, there were long pole axes and weaopons that looked like a singel edged knife ont he end of a pole known as a halbard.

Axes were both as a had to hand weapon AND for throwing.

There was the flail which was a spiked ball and 18 inch chain attached to a 2 foot handle. and the mace which was either a spiked or smooth ball or a series of metal flanges attached to a handle.

The also used bows and arrows and it was in mideivil times that the crossbow came into use.

The also had several varieties of catpults. as well as numerous varieties of knives and daggers.

2006-11-25 01:39:08 · answer #2 · answered by kveldulf_gondlir 6 · 0 0

First, get some thing proper. that's NORTHWESTERN college, and it quite is in Evanston, Illinois. 2d, she's qualified. 0.33, this form of rhetoric replaced into designed to harass human beings, some 40 years in the past. have you ever offered something greater moderen, or any evidence of something wherein she replaced into particularly in contact??? Face some information: the management of the yankee reactionary circulate, rather the "3 stooges", are not qualified to do something, and by no potential have performed something genuine. and a few of their insanity is even greater odd. you may even choose to outline terrorist earlier throwing the term around. Did she lots as provide every physique a warm foot, or in basic terms say issues which aggravated you? Oh. She replaced into "in contact"??? that's advisable to verify that slightly nearer and get some actual information, as a replace of those obscure, meaningless words, such Beck-like drivel. those too demented to pass on are much greater risky than people who stay in the 2d. it quite is solid to have a seen history, yet curiously your finished seen history is of harsh words, particularly than deeds. You look to point she could be an adjunct after the fact. it quite is absurd.

2016-12-13 13:55:16 · answer #3 · answered by montogomery 3 · 0 0

Swords, maces, axes, daggers and such for melee fighting.

Bows and crossbows for long range fighting.

Catapults, ballistas and such for siege fighting.

2006-11-24 22:41:50 · answer #4 · answered by sirtitus 2 · 0 0

Here are 2 sites

1 is for seige weapons:

http://www.castles-of-britain.com/castle36.htm

and 2 is for personal weapons

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_medieval_weapons

2006-11-24 22:26:23 · answer #5 · answered by jcboyle 5 · 0 0

everything! Sticks, stones, swords, axe ,knife, slingshot, dead animals, Trebauchet, ballister, Hammer, If it could be lifted or thrown or launched it was!

2006-11-24 22:27:20 · answer #6 · answered by SweetDeath! 3 · 0 0

swords, catapults, mase, bows and arrows, axes

2006-11-24 22:28:51 · answer #7 · answered by ernie_casarez 4 · 0 0

Bows
They were most commonly used from a distance. Their effectiveness increased dramatically as they were used from a higher altitude against lower targets as gravity would play an immense role in this.

Bows were divided into two categories (which later became three):

Regular Bows - Were the first to be used. They were very effective and they continued to be employed in medieval warfare as they were relatively light - and an skilled archer could fire up to 12 arrows per minute - which added to the effectiveness.

Long Bows - These first appeared in England, and later spread to the rest of Europe. They were very effective as they could easily penetrate a soldier's armor and more often than not, could also kill him in one shot.

As I mentioned earlier in this article, there was another discovery during the Dark Ages which changed drastically medieval warfare.

Crossbows - Crossbows were so effective that the church banned their use for a couple of years. Nevertheless, nobody listened and their use only widespread. A good crossbow could be easily fired at a moving target killing, if shot right, instantly.

Crossbows used, among other projectiles, quarrels which were extremely deadly. Afterwards, these were improved by adding venom or other deadly substances to guarantee death.



Swords
By far the most famous weaponry of the Middle Ages are the swords. They are often accompanied by the symbol of chivalry and knights.

Swords were divided into many categories, the two most important being:

Single-handed swords - These were usually very light and were accompanied by a shield. They could easily cut an unarmored opponent - but when the opponent was wearing an armor, they were not as useful. Nevertheless, these swords evolved and were made very sharp so they could penetrate any type of armory. This only happened after many centuries, and thus; were not very effective before. Single-handed swords were very common against barbaric tribes who rarely used armor. Nevertheless, against a well equipped army, they could be seemingly useless (unless used right).

Single-handed swords were also very popular for duels among nobles and the lower classes. They could generally mean the death of an opponent as they were so sharp that cuts were usually deadly.

Another technique used for these swords was to spray them with venom during battles so death was guaranteed. Nevertheless, there are very few recorded events in which this happened. What usually happened, though, was that these swords were never washed so cutting someone would result in an infection that could easily lead to death. Even though this practice was common, it was also counter-productive in some cases as it could, accidentally, kill the own wielder of the weapon.


Two-handed swords:They were usually very heavy and thus; only strong men could carry them. Since these swords could not be accompanied by a shield, most soldiers relied on very heavy armor in order to protect themselves effectively. This was, most of the time, a common cause for the slow demise of foot soldiers as carrying a complete heavy armor and a two-handed sword would result in an extreme amount of weight.

Nevertheless, two-handed swords were very effective at penetrating an enemy's armor. In most of the cases, they were so powerful that not only could they destroy an armor, but they could also completely cut a man in two - his armor included.

This simple fact of extreme effectiveness against armored foot soldiers, is what made two-handed swords so effective. A single-handed sword was virtually useless against a knight using a two-handed sword and heavy armor.



Hammers
During the Middle ages, all sorts of weaponry was used. Hammers were not the exception as they were very useful to knock down an opponent even if he was wearing heavy armory.

When medieval soldiers realized how effective hammers truly were, they began developing variations which proved to be deadlier. Even though hammers were very effective at certain aspects, they were still no match for a good soldier with a two-handed sword. Hammers were usually reserved for poor soldiers or as a last resource.



Daggers
Daggers were very common during medieval warfare. They were used, mainly, as an alternative in case the soldier's main weapon was unavailable, or in case he needed more flexibility.

In the case of archers, daggers were used as an alternative in case they were captured or surrounded. Additionally, during extreme need, archers could use their daggers to attack - which was very ineffective, but used nevertheless.

They were very sharp and small - the smaller the better. A very good dagger could even penetrate light armor and, if the enemy was not wearing armor, he could be easily killed with only one blow.

This made daggers to be used widely throughout the Dark Ages.

Daggers, later on, became another sign of chivalry (though not as famous as a sword) - they were generally passed from generation through generation since they would rarely deteriorate if made from a good material.


Siege Weapons
Of course siege weapons were very widely used during the Dark Ages. Since medieval warfare consisted more of battles against castles, then it is very conspicuous how siege weapons proved to be so effective.

Even when used in open-field battles, siege weapons were still effective as they could be used to kill up to dozens of soldiers with a single missile launch! This caused terror, and, combined with archer fire made battles something incredible to watch.

Siege weapons included, but were not limited to: Catapults, trebuchets, and many more. These two later were both (in the case of a castle siege) used for defense and attack purposes.

Later elaborated castles, as it can be seen in the castle timeline, were suitable to place catapults and trebuchets on top of them. This was a good strategy as missiles fired from such an altitude could easily reach soldiers who were very far away.



Late Medieval Weapons - Gunpowder
During the late Middle Ages, many discoveries took place. The one which most notoriously affected the course of warfare was gunpowder.

Soon after its discovery, every major army used gunpowder in order to attack opposing armies. Every time open field battles were more scarce and even knights came to an abrupt end as their power seemed to be vanquished when gunpowder was finally incorporated.

Cannons were mostly used against castles - and later they were also employed during most medieval battles. Since they were so effective, newer castles had to be constructed within a very short timeframe.

All of these factors greatly changed the course of warfare and newer weapons were made rapidly. Another major achievement was incorporating cannons to ships which eliminated traditional naval warfare of ships ramming each other - rendering that sort of battle useless.

Armor against gunpowder was also useless.



As it can be noted by reading the previous paragraphs, newer weapons abruptly brought the end to traditional warfare - and it is speculated that newer battle techniques rushed the ending of the Dark Ages. This, of course, cannot be only blamed to gunpowder, but it was a determining factor which played an enormous role in medieval history.


Armor
Armor too played an enormous role during the Dark Ages, as it can be noted in the section above. A good armor, nevertheless, was usually very heavy, thus decreasing the wielder's speed and flexibility. This, however, did not stop foot soldiers from using them as they were usually very effective against other foot soldiers and, primary, against arrows.

When crossbows were invented, armors had to be severely strengthened or else they would be rendered useless. This only made an armor heavier which killed soldiers over time.

What is most characteristic about armors is the helmet. Thousands of them were created and they were very different in style. Newer helmets were capable of resisting even boiling water!

A foot soldier with a very heavy armor to be stopped, had to be surrounded, completely tired, weaponless and ambushed for his armor to be opened and then for his enemieo be able to kill him - as it is apparent, armors were very effective indeed!

Additionally, shields were also widely employed as they were very effective against both, projectile and melee combat.

Gudendag Weapon
Weapons
The gudendag has its origins when many Flemish peasants wanted to join the army but couldn't because of a lack of weaponry.

It was then when the gudendag, meaning "Good Day" was invented by the 'discovery' of a regular peasant hammer being useful against armored soldiers.

It was then when most peasants fought for their rights because of more available weaponry. It is obvious, however; that even though a gudendag could be seemingly useful against an armored knight, a sword was much stronger.

Gudendags were greatly transformed throughout the centuries and they had spikes or other metal objects adhered to them in order to make them deadlier.

Gudendags were used during the Roman Times as well, but most people attribute them to the Dark Ages.
Who Invented the Trebuchet?
Weapons
Trebuchets were not as old as catapults were. Trebuchets are said by most historians to be invented directly by the French in the XII century - of course trebuchets later spread to the rest of Europe.

The real inventor of the trebuchet is unknown - mostly because it is said that it was an invention of many and not only one man. Trebuchets were later improved from generation to generation.

Many manuscripts dating from the XIII century describe the trebuchet to be the most effective siege weapon of them all.

To read more about trebuchets, visit my Medieval Trebuchets article.
Medieval Shields - Protection Against Damage
Weapons
Medieval shields were usually very strong because of the newly developed weapons which could easily destroy a light shield.


A shield's primary function was to defend a soldier against swords or projectiles. Projectiles were useless against shields (unless they were longbows, and the shields practically worthless). Additionally, foot soldiers could arrange themselves and box up - meaning that they could have protection from three sides by cooperatively aligning their shields which could help them progress slowly and steadily while minimizing damage caused from projectiles and swords.

The second main function of a shield was of recognition. A shield very frequently carried the emblem of the country to which the soldier belonged. Battles were often very confusing and recognizing who was a friend and foe could be a very tedious labor - hence the construction of shields with emblems for an easier recognition.

The third function of a shield was to attack. Even though this is quite unbelievable since a shield was mainly designed to be defensive, shields could also be offensive. Better shields would very frequently have a sharp side so the user could hit his enemy and kill him with one blow. A shield, since it was made of metal and very heavy, could easily kill an enemy in a single strike. Of course they were very slow - but that didn't matter as a strong wielder could easily move it fast enough to accomplish his main purpose of survival by killing.

As it can be noted, shields were very effective and thus their enormous use. There was a huge variety of shields .
Try the websites more information awaiting.

2006-11-24 22:40:21 · answer #8 · answered by cool 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers