why cruel leaders are replaced to have a new cruel leaders?

Answer 1

yes we all want peace in the world but i donno why the nation allows it why cant they take actions immediately but i know one thing that the media people they wont have any news givig thing and whatever might stop and the government will start acting that we dont have any money we have spent all of the money and bla bla bla and my point is that they wanna impress us and to earn money they can do anything and i think you might have got my point and thats all i wanna say

Answer 2

because it is neccessary. unless all the people in the country are against cruel regime and would create some kind of revolution. when say all the people that also includes those in the governing system.

if not, why it is neccessary? because the servicemen in the government structures are chosen and befitted in a way that would only benefit the cruel leader. and so when he dies or out of power the next one has to take the same way as him to control the country. see for Iraq, if the successor of Saddam were to be a cruel leader as himself, it would be much easier to control the whole nation. surpressing those different radicles and keep control under an iron fist.

you can see what happens when democracy is given to those accustoms to fearsome leaders. they take for granted that the new leaders couldn't treat them the same like the cruel leader.

Answer 3

Cruel leaders aren't being replaced with new cruel leaders!

Answer 4

Because the person doing the replacing looks better than the person who is in charge.

Then you realize you have swapped evil for evil

Answer 5

Weak ignorant citizens.

Answer 6

Where are you talking about, Cuba, Iran? It's just a thing I guess.

Answer 7

the cuban leader thing..

Answer 8

Don't really know, better ask Clinton