Whole + fraction = fraction.
Whole is in fraction.
Equivalence + difference = difference.
Equivalence is in difference.
Infinite + finite = finite.
Infinite is in finite.
Cause + effect = effect.
Cause is in effect.
Influence + sensation = sensation.
Influence is in sensation.
Origin + derivative = derivative.
Origin is in derivative.
Rule + condition = condition.
Rule is in condition.
Universal + particular = particular.
Universal is in particular.
Complete + incomplete = incomplete.
Complete is in incomplete.
Invariant + variant = variant.
Invariant is in variant.
Characteristic + character = character.
Characteristic is in character.
Ideal + real = real.
Ideal is in real.
Unity + diversity = diversity.
Unity is in diversity.
General + special = special.
General is in special.
Perfection + imperfection = imperfection.
Perfection is in imperfection.
Pure + impure = impure.
Pure is in impure.
Fulfillment + intent = intent.
Fulfillment is in intent.
2006-11-24 13:41:29 · 12 answers · asked by The Knowledge Server 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
Disagree with practically all of them.
2006-11-24 13:43:52 · answer #1 · answered by Sophist 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I agree with someof them but it seems that you just put a whole lot of antonyms together and said one was in the other one. I think some of them don't make any sense like general + special= special. All you did was take two antonyms add them together and take the 2 word and put it on the outside of and equal sign.
It seems like you are trying to be to philosphical and its not working out for you.
2006-11-24 22:21:23 · answer #2 · answered by lexi 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
These equations are incorrect. Plug in X as a value for a word and then you are adding something to X on one side and not the other, so you have a state of inequality. On the word side, the prefix is like a negative value, so then again, no equality.
2006-11-24 22:26:44 · answer #3 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Some of them seem right... to an extent...
But some of them make no sense.
Whole is in fraction? Wouldn't a fraction be in a whole?
2006-11-24 21:46:23 · answer #4 · answered by Greek 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
my conclusion is that you don't give up when people tell you this over and over again. YOU DON"T MAKE ANY SENSE
Go ask questions in your own language.
I am soooooo sick of this.
What planet are u from?
These aren't questions. If you don't get answers whY ON EARth DO YOU ASK OVER AND OVER AGAIN.
please STOP NOW
2006-11-25 07:43:42 · answer #5 · answered by sugarsweetsweetiepie 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
YOU are insane
NON Of this makes sense.
Please stop with the same thing over and voer again.
YOU have very poor use of the english language.
Why don't you just StOP
2006-11-25 07:53:42 · answer #6 · answered by cuttiestrawberypie 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
theres a difference between the tw0 things you have added
and you can't just add them because of that..so the best thing to do is to subtract....
2006-11-24 22:03:30 · answer #7 · answered by yucanzee 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
rethink it completely and read some books that arent about religioun but are about quantum theory or something. u just waisted 2 minutes of my life thanks alot.
2006-11-24 23:32:21 · answer #8 · answered by ? 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Read up on formal fallacies (Logic)
2006-11-24 22:26:23 · answer #9 · answered by mattcolin87 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
My opinion is that they are simplistic and ineffective when they are not utterly wrong.
2006-11-24 21:50:34 · answer #10 · answered by blueowlboy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋