Ok, OJ book and TV show was cancelled...did OJ commit the murders?

Question

and if he did, was it him alone or with an accomplice? Or did someone do it for him?

Answer 1

He still claims he did not, and I still think he did

Answer 2

OJ was thoroughly investigated, tried in court and had the evidence evaluated by a jury who found him "not guilty" of this crime. He has always maintained his innocence of this deed and he wrote a theoretical book (which does not contain a confession). Money not narcissism was probably the motivation in writing the book as there is a civil suit debt and a need to provide an inheritance for his children etc. The trial attorney's Cochran, Marcia and Darden wrote their own books and received millions.
A few things that the jury may have considered:
-The investigator who found the glove later committed PERJURY regarding his extreme racist comments.
- Another investigator took a vial sample of OJ's blood from the lab and carried it INTO the crime scene.
- The glove DID NOT fit OJ's hand (wrong size).
- There never was the amount of blood on OJ's body, clothes, house or car CONSISTENT with someone who had committed that crime in person..
- The murder weapon was NEVER connected to him or found.
- The jury was taken to visit OJ's house and DID NOT see a large blood trail.
- There were no witnesses to the actual crime.
- Likely the jury found him innocent because there was a LACK of real evidence to convict.
Some may disagree with the verdict but it's unfair for them to blatantly say with a certainty that this man is guilty.
At times a publisher controls the general content and even the title of a book which an author must agree to if he needs the contract

Answer 3

All you have to do is look at the blood evidence for your answer. Blood at the murder scene was put to the DNA test and the numbers came out that there would actually have to be more people on earth for some of the blood to be anyone other than O.J.
I think he did it himself.As for a large conspiracy on the scale it had to be on, two people can hardly keep a secret let alone the hundred people it would have to take to frame O.J. The verdict was purely emotional and racially motivated.I am astounded still at the denial of fact the jury must have excercised.

Answer 4

If he did do it then he can't be tried again 4 the same crime.Yes I believe he did it but he had high paying lawyers working 4 him so of course he got away with it lol.If it was a poor person they'd spend their lifetime in jail no joke

Answer 5

He was found 'not guilty' in the criminal case. (which does not mean 'innocent' necessarily). But he WAS found liable in a civil "wrongful death" suit, which means he owes $38 million dollars to the families of the victims. Helloooooo - how could he be found liable/guilty, and not be guilty? Of course he did it!!! The evidence is overwhelming, and it's public record.

Answer 6

He was found innocent in court but a lot of people believe he did it. His book was going to be called something along the lines of "IF I did it, this is how I would've" which sort of admits he was guilty. Even if he admits it though, they cannot send him back to court because of the double jeopardy law.

Answer 7

there are enough books on the market to satisfy your curiosity. read them all. you can specialize on the subject and write a PhD thesis. case closed.

Answer 8

There's a big difference between innocent and not guilty.
He's an embarassment to the human race.

Answer 9

The civil court that found him responsible to pay certainly thought so.

Answer 10

Yep, I believe he did it alright and I will always think so--there is a Greater Judgement to come.

Answer 11

Of course he did it and got away with it. The cops should of shot his @ss as he was driving down the Freeway back to his home.