gore and westbrook.....no doubt....alexander hasnt' proven anything...and with out hutchinson on his line....he's not very productive....gore is a stud.....and the rams defense sucks.....westbrook lost mcnabb so he'll have more weight on his shoulders than ever...recieving the short throws cuz garcia has a weak arm....and running all over the colts terrible run defense
2006-11-24 18:45:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by nairb8979 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would go with:
1. Gore because he has been awesome all year. STL has a pretty bad defense.
2. Westbrook against the AWFUL Indy run defense
3. Alexander still isn't 100%, so I wouldn't start him until he proves he can play a full game.
2006-11-24 13:38:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by Danger Russ 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
do gore and westbrook because they both go against horrible run defenses. No Mcnabb will probably lead to more carries for westbrook and gore is a stud. Alexander is a bust and still hasn't had a good game.
2006-11-24 13:37:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by Jon P 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Gore and Westbrook Alexander is just coming off of his injury see how he does first before you start him again
2006-11-24 13:37:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by Travis L 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah i'm agreeing with everyone; go with Gore and Westbrook
Gore because He's a beast now and Westbrook because they're playing Indy, their rush-def. is 31st in the league
Give Alexander another week, i mean come on he couldn't even get 60 yards vs. SF
note: GO SF!!!!
2006-11-24 14:29:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by Stephen 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Go with Westbrook, even more if you are in a point per reception league.
2006-11-24 15:55:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by Bignizz66 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
gore is on fire right now and st louis sux vs. run
westbrook will run all over indy's horrible run D
GORE & WESTBROOK...wait on alexander for now...
2006-11-24 14:34:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by David U 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
alway go with westbrook. indy's run defense sucks.
2006-11-24 13:26:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by jeffy 3
·
0⤊
1⤋