Did OJ do it or not?

Answer 1

OJ was thoroughly investigated, tried in court and had the evidence evaluated by a jury who found him "not guilty" of this crime. He has always maintained his innocence of this deed and he wrote a theoretical book (which does not contain a confession). Money was probably the motivation in writing the book as there is a civil suit debt and a need to provide an inheritance for his children etc. The trial attorney's Cochran, Marcia and Darden wrote their own books and received millions.
A few things that the jury may have considered:
-The investigator who found the glove later committed PERJURY regarding his extreme racist comments.
- Another investigator took a vial sample of OJ's blood from the lab and carried it INTO the crime scene.
- The glove DID NOT fit OJ's hand.
- There never was the amount of blood on OJ's body, clothes, house or car CONSISTENT with someone who had committed that crime in person..
- The murder weapon was NEVER connected to him or found.
- The jury was taken to visit OJ's house and DID NOT see a large blood trail.
- There were no witnesses to the actual crime.
- Likely the jury found him innocent because there was a LACK of real evidence to convict.
Some may disagree with the verdict but it's unfair for them to blatantly say with a certainty that this man is guilty.
At times a publisher controls the general content and even the title of a book which an author must agree to if he needs the contract.

Answer 2

No, his oldest son did it.

1) DNA evidence was not a good enough match to be OJ. A REAL statistician could tell you that.
2) Son was the ONLY person who did not have his DNA checked. Why not?
3) Son was/is a chef.
4) Chefs have their own knives. It's like a mechanic and their tools -- they are inseparable.
5) Murders were committed with a knife from a set belonging to a chef
6)OJ's son had to buy a new set IMMEDIATELY AFTER the murders, saying he 'lost' his.
7) Son had no alibi for the time of the murders, but this was never pursued by LAPD. Corruption? Cover-up? Just plain normal police arrogance and stupidity?

OJ's son is the true guilty party. OJ is covering up.

Answer 3

They DNA tests siad there wasn't another human's blood on earth who could have matched the OJ blood in the van. It was a government payoff of jurors to prevent widespread violence. if OJ were conviicted.

Answer 4

yes he did. the case will be one of the most famous goof ups of all trials saying if the glove fits you must convict and then giving the man a leather glove that had been soaked in blood then dried to put on was just plain stupid . who hasn't had leather shrink when it gets wet and then dries without some form holding it in place .

Answer 5

stop this non-sense question and questioning. we have had enough about this two letters -- increase it to the four letters word and let it go. the decadence of such an event in the jurisprudence and justice denied will be forever in our minds. case closed.

Answer 6

yes

Answer 7

Not sure it's possible though

Answer 8

who knows?

Answer 9

yea he did it ............and should not have wrote that book............he should let those two people rest in peace

Answer 10

YES HE DID COMMIT THE MURDERS. HAD SOMETHING TO DO WITH IT.