can someone explain to me the quantum thoery in laymans terms?

Question

i know alot of information on the theory of relativity but where does quantum mechanics fit in?

Answer 1

Quantum mechanics is often referred to as the non-relativistic theory. Where as Einstein's relativity theories were smooth continuums, quantum theory is based on quanta - specific quantities of energy that cannot exist in a smaller amount. At first, Einstein, in an effort to sort out both the wave and particle characteristics of light was a major contributor to the theory. When Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principal was later introduced to try and explain the seemingly random characteristics of sub-atomic particles, Einstein became a major opponent. There just was no wiggle room in Einstein's theories or thought process for randomness. The theories are somewhat contradictory in many points - my nickel's on Einstein, whose equations have been verified many, many times in actual laboratory experiments and scientific observations. Quantum mechanics, none the less, explain the seemingly arbitrary particle emissions and other sub-atomic phenomenon and have garnered a pretty steady following among today's theoretical physicists.
Perhaps the two theories may be united some day in an all in one theory that unites all of the forces.

Answer 2

There's no simple, straightforward way to summarize quantum theory. There are just too many aspects to it, few of which are totally understood. Einstein's relativity explains our world on one level--the macro universe--while quantum physics takes over at spatial sizes smaller than 1.6 ^ minus 35 meters. Among the many weird things that happen down at the quantum level is what has been called "spooky action at a distance" where two identical subatomic particles can be separated by vast distances and when the properties of one is artificially altered, the second particle seems to instantly "know" about it and will spontaneously alter itself.

Answer 3

the fee of sound is approx 700mph - the fee of sunshine is a few distance quicker (easy takes approx 8 minutes to get from the sunlight to pay attention and thats hundreds of thousands and hundreds of thousands of equivalent miles - you're able to desire to get your calculator out and artwork out how long sound could take yet of direction, sound would not shuttle in area using vacuum). My wisdom of the concept of relativity (and it could desire to not be completely precise) is that for a physique to realize the fee of sunshine (or "countless" velocity) you're able to require "countless" capacity (i.e. all the capacity in the universe) and subsequently could require countless mass (i.e. all the mass or count number in the universe). As you could think of, for a layman including myself, for this reason it extremely is undemanding to believe Einstein, that velocity of sunshine shuttle isn't available. of direction, noone instructed additionally those easy photons that bypass around! the concept additionally is going on approximately: what in case you have been on a prepare on the decrease back of the carriage, vacationing on the fee of sunshine and then moved to the front, you're able to in fact be vacationing at quicker than easy speeds (which Mr E stated is impossible). ultimately, Mr E bangs on approximately in case you have been on the prepare doing the fee of sunshine (S.O.L.) your concept could be distinctive to somebody status via the part of the "prepare music" - think of you're watching a tree; what you're actually seeing is the sunshine (that took 8 minutes to reach from the sunlight) bounce of the tree on your eyes, which sends the electrical powered sign on your concepts which tells you you're seeing a tree. prepare that occasion to the bystander gazing the S.O.L. prepare - what are you able to work out whilst the prepare is shifting on an analogous velocity using fact the sunshine that desires to bounce off the prepare to realize your eyes? i think of using fact of this Mr E known because it the concept of relativity because of this bearing in concepts of the relative perceptions of the prepare passenger and the music bystander. As I pronounced, that's my wisdom and that i could desire to be way incorrect - i could propose you examine "a quick heritage of Time" via Stephen Hawkings, even in spite of the undeniable fact that i've got examine it thrice (final time grew to become into approximately 5 years in the past) and that i nevertheless sense like a caveman grappling with a Nintendo DS! stable success on your journey in the direction of enlightenment - could the strain be with you!

Answer 4

Take a look at http://thisquantumworld.com

Answer 5

No.