Why did conservatives support a federal ban on gay marriage, i thought they supported states rights?

Question

Wern't the republicans for states having more power? why did they all of a sudden wanted the federal government in control with this issue.

Answer 1

because they thought by doing this the religious institutions in america will continue to support them despite the war in Iraq. they were wrong.

Answer 2

I think the same thing too. I support states' rights to some limit. I believe gay marriage should be left for states to decide if they wanted it. The conservatives are losing their core values of limited federal government. They have become fiscal liberals and social conservatives, caring more about gay marriage than how to have a balanced budget. A constitutional ban is a federalist tactic and it would violate states' rights. I think Republicans are turning their back on their fiscal conservatism. Goldwater wouldn't be happy. They are no longer the party of Einsenhower, Goldwater, and Lincoln. They have become a party full of religious right-wingers who want to extend federal power to fulfill their "moral" goals. This is why I'm not a Republican until the evangelicals leave it alone. You are right in posting this question and congratulate you.

Answer 3

The problem with have Gay marriage as a states rights issue is that because of Federal law, a contract recognized in one state must be honored by every other state, that means that if one states allows gay marriage then all the other states are forced too as well... Thats why this cannot be a simple states right issue

Answer 4

Conservatives wanted it brought to a constitutional convention, which, IF passed would reflect the will of the people in the most literal legal sense. I live in Massachusetts and know the difference. You are slanting it to the point of being dishonest, and I suspect you are doing that on purpose, thought I don't know for sure.
The liberal state legislature here chose NOT to bring it to the constitutional convention though 10 times the amount of signatures were delivered.
Now,. I don't give much of a crap about gay marriage one way or another. But it is utterly clear that it was the left who demonstrated a vulgar display of power, not conservatives, as you try to paint.

Answer 5

Conservatives DO believe in states rights. In 2003, Justices Anthony Kennedy, Sandra Day O'Connor, and a couple of other Republican-appointed Justices demonstrated that THEY do not believe in states rights when they struck down the sodomy laws of 13 states. That's the federal government in action, usurping state authority. And the fear of conservatives who support the federal ban on gay marriage -- justifiably so -- is that at some point in the future, the Supreme Court of the United States might legalize gay marriage nationwide, rather than just the state courts like Massachusetts.

Answer 6

Because the real issue isn't about marriage. The real issue is about federal tax money. Homosexuals have always been able to marry. Now they are lobbying for the federal tax breaks which are given to heterosexual couples. The federal ban is against the tax breaks, which is not a states rights issue.

Answer 7

I personally don't agree with the Government telling us who we can marry, but this was not a straight party issue Social Conservatives are the ones voting for this one. there are social conservatives on both sides of the isle. I very strongly support states rights. How can D.C. really represent me?
By the way I am a Conservative and proud of it.

Answer 8

The protection of Marriage act would not dictate own relationships. It purely states that the federal government would not know gay marriages. Now, you are able to argue that the government shouldn't know any marriage, and that i could be prepared to concur, yet to argue that it denies them a precise would not think approximately that marriage isn't a precise interior the 1st place. As a real conservative, you are going to be attentive to that our bill of rights are actually not only rules given to us by utilising a team of adult adult males in 1789. As lots of the founders have observed, they wrote the bill of rights so as that it substitute into understood that they got here from a extra robust capability, in any different case, if adult adult males gave them, adult adult males can take them away. alongside comes the progressive circulate, and that they understood that as a fashion to take over, they must weaken the bill of rights. And as a fashion to try this, they knew they mandatory to weaken the church. that's what it extremely is definitely approximately. The left is utilising gay marriage rules already on the books to litigate and or threaten church homes and individuals with opposite non secular ideals into financial disaster enterprise. by utilising the way, in case you're a conservative, i'm Obama's exertions czar. you have 5 questions listed on your profile, and the only different one seen political is one the place you ask why marijuana could nevertheless be unlawful. feels like a real conservative to me.

Answer 9

First of all it's none of the governments darn business whether a couple guys or a couple girls want to marry each other. The government has no business legislating morality. That's not their job.
Some conservatives (Repulicans) support it because their voter base is made up of many Right Wing Christian Fundamentalists who like nothing better than to ram their version of what is right down the throats of everyone else.

My politics lean more toward Libertarianism. I'm fiscally conservative and believe in less government (just like Republicans are supposed to believe). But, I also believe in personal freedom and the right of anyone to do as they please as long as it harms no one but themselves.

Answer 10

Sorry (sorta) us big bellied overfed beer drinkin church goin conservative war mongers were raised to believe that people gettin married should at least have opposing sex organs... States rights are ok too

Answer 11

The RedsStates are pro Closet


Go big Red Go