(and for some reason they HAD to drop it)
2006-11-24 12:47:21 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Fallujah Iraq
Because everytime we have an operation up there we kill HUNDREDS and THOUSANDS of terrorists. Why not blow that place up? Sounds like a terrorists hide out too me.
2006-11-24 13:21:26 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Venezuela (or some such country) which has been a thorn and has denied being useful to US.
Afghanistan - it would only damage slightly some mountains. There is really not much for a nuke to do there.
Iraq does not need a nuke. There is really not much left after the US invasion for a nuke to destroy.
As for Iran, US has doubts that Iran has nuclear ambitions. Iran wants to be friendly with US, or why would they offer money for US tourists to visit their country ?
China is not possible. That would be disastrous for US economy. Thanksgiving sale would be a washout without Chinese products.
2006-11-24 20:57:00 · answer #2 · answered by ramshi 4 · 3⤊ 4⤋
People, wake up! Ur country - America is full of foreigners and mixed babies. Why do u want to provoke a war what will lead to the end of the world? If they drop a nuce anywhere, in USA will this "immigrants" get very angry.. Lot of them are living there fr years and u cannot recognize them from others.. Do u really want to live in d world where u cannot be sure if ur neighbor is not coming this night to kill u and Ur wife and children???
2006-11-24 21:08:48 · answer #3 · answered by w_chantall 2 · 1⤊ 4⤋
The direct answer is: on ~NO COUNTRY, NO PEOPLES, NO PLACE~
Alex, What a sad testament to you. Your "inquiry" does not read as an educated question, nor does it warrant any more than a reprimand for your poor judgment, your poor choice of thoughts, all completely at the expense of your credibility.
How can a proposition to detonate a bomb with the sole purpose of destroying others en masse ever serve as a valid basis for intellectual debate, or even one for "fun and frivolity"? Is your intention to waste your time and ours on insidious and manipulative questions?
_No Life is a toy, nor is Life's purpose cause for rallying support shielded in the guise of
2006-11-25 01:52:05 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 1⤊ 4⤋
San Fransisco and blame it on Iran so we could have another war, and get rid of the new incomming speaker of the house, and rally the poeple for a war in Iran
2006-11-25 09:00:02 · answer #5 · answered by paulisfree2004 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
San Fransisco
2006-11-24 21:15:12 · answer #6 · answered by Ranger473 4 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Iran, would address the most problems:
Hezbollah, Syria, would be undermined,
Hamas, al Qaeda, North Korea would wake up,
Our soldiers next door in Iraq would be under less threat than they now are from Iran.
2006-11-24 21:04:29 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Tehran, Iran. Take care of Mahmud Ahmadinedad!
2006-11-24 20:57:56 · answer #8 · answered by Bawney 6 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Tehran
2006-11-24 20:56:04 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Oh come on, Alex, is this really something to joke about?
We can't have just one if we are going to start that. I'm thinking we need at least 3.
2006-11-24 20:58:01 · answer #10 · answered by ? 7 · 7⤊ 3⤋