have you ever wondered this?
2006-11-24 11:46:46 · 7 answers · asked by Cap'n Donna 7 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
No.
But now that you brought it up....
2006-11-24 11:49:26 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, it is no longer because of the fact of incredibly some divorces. right that's what Wikipedia says with regard to the commencing place of the call: "besides the fact that the term era X seems returned as far because of the fact the early Nineteen Sixties, it became into popularized by Douglas Coupland's 1991 novel era X: memories for an speeded up way of existence, wherein Coupland defined the angst of those born between type of 1960 and 1965, who, initially and incorrectly categorized as area of the infant advance era, felt no connection to its cultural icons. In Coupland's utilization, the X of era X spoke of the namelessness of a era that became into getting into an expertise of its existence as a separate team yet feeling dwarfed and overshadowed by the Boomer era of which it became into ostensibly an element. "
2016-12-10 15:21:17 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, it is not because of so many divorces. Here is what Wikipedia says about the origin of the name:
"Although the term Generation X appears back as far as the early 1960s, it was popularized by Douglas Coupland's 1991 novel Generation X: Tales for an Accelerated Culture, in which Coupland described the angst of those born between roughly 1960 and 1965, who, originally and incorrectly labeled as part of the baby boom generation, felt no connection to its cultural icons. In Coupland's usage, the X of Generation X referred to the namelessness of a generation that was coming into an awareness of its existence as a separate group but feeling dwarfed and overshadowed by the Boomer generation of which it was ostensibly a part. "
2006-11-24 11:57:02 · answer #3 · answered by Anniesgran 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
well, wats wrong with everyone bein divorced? there just isn't enough of the decent men in this world. too many criminals to find a decent, well rounded, nice looking, nice guy.
2006-11-24 11:49:41 · answer #4 · answered by P!ATD GIRL! Luvn Brendon Urie! 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Not until now. But I think you may be right. Sad isn't it.
2006-11-24 11:48:37 · answer #5 · answered by Sexy-n-Hot 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
LOLOLOLOL that is a good one gal! Never thought of it that way!
2006-11-24 11:49:00 · answer #6 · answered by tigerlily_catmom 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no, because they have NO identity!!
2006-11-24 11:48:14 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋