Not the death toll, the injured toll.
2006-11-24 09:59:09 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
The U.S. government does not wish this to be known. That's what they said on the evening news.
2006-11-24 10:22:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
To presidential press secretary Tony Snow, 2,500 is obviously "only" an off-the-cuff type, the form of yankee infantrymen killed in Iraq for this reason far, as of the different day. Why could we pay attention approximately physique luggage and deaths and how many, what day it extremely is gonna happen? it extremely is not suitable. So why could I waste my attractive ideas on something like that?" — George W. Bush's mom Barbara on ABC/stable Morning u . s . of america, March 18, 2003
2016-11-26 20:32:36 · answer #2 · answered by quijada 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe the most accurate reports claim that twenty times as many U.S. soldiers have been injured, maimed, or permanently disabled - as have died - as a result of this inane 'war'. That would put the total at around 60,000. -RKO-
2006-11-24 14:38:07 · answer #3 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the US government doesnt disclose injury reports because they feel if a soldier comes home alive or returns to duty, then the incident ended successfully. crazy aint it? if youre breathing u can be missing both arms, both legs, be blind, deaf, and mute but youre a success in the US's eyes
2006-11-26 22:41:28 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
60,000 sounds about right, imagine how many Iraqis it's their houses getting bombed woman and children that aren't apparently newsworthy
2006-11-24 17:50:51 · answer #5 · answered by j. a. prufrock 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
somewhere around 7 billion
2006-11-24 15:56:16 · answer #6 · answered by rf467fhgf4 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
over 60,000
2006-11-24 12:22:20 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋