Which would be the better match, and why?
1) Federer vs. Nadal on clay (in 2007)
2) Roddick vs. Blake (2007)
3) Borg vs. Federer both in prime
2006-11-24 09:51:18 · 6 answers · asked by tim8laura238 2 in Sports ➔ Tennis
who would win the match and why (is what i meant)
2006-11-24 10:31:42 · update #1
Federer vs. Nadal on clay in 2007, because their previous matches have been close on clay (In Rome 2006, Federer had match points to win in the fifth set). Also Federer has now beat him two times in a row (not on clay) and I think has a better idea how to play him having played him so many times. The mental edge is with the World Number 1 Roger Federer right now. GO FED EXPRESS!!!!
2006-11-24 16:59:14 · answer #1 · answered by Mike B 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
#1 but only because they're definitely the best players out there right now. I think Nadal would pull it out in 4 sets, he dominates on clay. I haven't seen enough of Roddick and Blake to be able to compare them well. I've only seen a little bit of Borg but I'm sure Federer and him would have a great match. Old school vs. New Legend!
2006-11-24 21:47:02 · answer #2 · answered by Carole F 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
1) Federer vs. Nadal on clay (in 2007)
because Nadal would win because he is the KING OF CLAY!
2006-11-24 18:38:39 · answer #3 · answered by shop2liv1s 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
3) Borg vs. Federer
2006-11-24 18:26:33 · answer #4 · answered by Bo V 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nadal and Federer would be the best this year...federer has imporved greatly!!! I PICK FEDERER IN 5 SETS....6-7, 7-5, 6-4, 2-6, 6-3!!!!
2006-11-24 18:57:38 · answer #5 · answered by Gt tennis 09 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
1) Federer & Nadal ... always interesting to watch especially now that federer is getting better on clay
2006-11-24 19:36:46 · answer #6 · answered by berty198 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋