English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

10 answers

cause most are waiting for the democrats in office to start the fight. watch the news....many are beginning the fight in congress to investigate it all.

and if you are still a believer that we were attacked by an outside force....then you missed basic science and math in all grades of school. every part of the attacks breaks basic mathmatics.

why not do some research yourself before calling saying something isn't true. I myself was once a believer it was terrorists till I did MY OWN HOMEWORK and realized how bad we have been lied too.

Knowledge is power...never take anything at face value, do your own work and find out the truth. the truth is out there. even on government documents.

2006-11-24 08:21:26 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

i might think of that's greater substantial in the beginning because of the fact greater human beings died, and secondly because of the fact it marked the commencing up of a shift in Western attitudes in the direction of terrorism, Islam and the commencing up of the completed conflict on Terror. of course the masses of alternative acts of terrorism that have occurred in present day times international are substantial, yet their magnitude isn't as lots. additionally, there have been greater far-achieving outcomes - 9/11 tousled the financial gadget for months, finished agencies have been virtually worn out and the well-being impacts proceed to on the present time. i think the seen is likewise so lots greater memorable - crumbling sky scrapers are patently going to stick in human beings's minds greater effective than a blown up bus. i do no longer think of it is something to do with human beings thinking they're greater effective or something like that, 9/11 is fairly greater substantial in terms of what occurred afterwards. it is basically how that's. As to the conspiracy theories, nicely, the kind of circumstantial information that fuels conspiracy theories did no longer fairly exist in those different situations, and according to hazard persons are basically much less trusting of the U. S. government?

2016-12-10 15:14:39 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I have. People still blame Rudy and Bush of imploding the WTC... like those two ever agreed on anything b/4 9/11.

2006-11-24 10:22:28 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The Democrats had already got what they want, a demolition of the Republicans in the recent election. Thus, they are no longer bringing the issue in this site.

2006-11-24 08:25:27 · answer #4 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0 1

Becaus now they dont have to try to convince people to vote Dem since the election is over. It will probably start back up ion about 12-15 months.

2006-11-24 08:20:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I didn't know there was any correlation. I always thought that those conspiracy theories were something that right wingers concocted given they seem to be rather "suspicious souls".

2006-11-24 08:21:31 · answer #6 · answered by kobacker59 6 · 0 1

never count a liberal conspiracy theorist out...every time i think of this i get a chuckle thinking of hillary r explaining her way out of 937 files when daniel ellsburg had one. liberals never learn.

2006-11-24 08:24:31 · answer #7 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 0 0

They haven't gotten in until next year.

2006-11-24 08:20:41 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You haven't been looking. There are still lots of fruitcakes out there.

2006-11-24 09:29:44 · answer #9 · answered by blueprairie 4 · 0 1

Maybe people are breathing a sigh of relief!!!!

2006-11-24 08:20:34 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers