Why didn't they go for Adam or Candace?? They were more of a target to me.
2006-11-24 07:14:13 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Television
For some reason, Jonathan had loyalty to Adam (or at least, less disloyalty than for everyone else) and the five all had to agree for their plan to work. I'd have rather seen Adam go. Or Parvati - she's one of those who can fly in under the radar and get to the end, and she's amazingly annoying.
2006-11-24 08:00:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Go Ozzie! I think they are eliminating people by smartness now, and Nate was a smart (and cute) guy! Hated seeing him go and hope Yul doesn' t leave anytime soon, since he's the only other one with a bod that counts! Thanks for the points and Happy Holidays to you and everyone! Survivor rules!
2006-11-24 07:20:25 · answer #2 · answered by HotInTX 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nate was the best, why did'nt they go for Adam or Candace?
2006-11-24 07:18:51 · answer #3 · answered by frankmilano610 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
He was flip flopping against his original tribe and people seen him as a threat because he was changing alliances.I think it should have been Jonathan.
2006-11-25 02:12:24 · answer #4 · answered by Celebrity girl 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋