English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

why don't "pro-lifers" slander people with fetus-killer instead of baby-killer and tell the truth for a change?

2006-11-24 06:48:34 · 14 answers · asked by blonde101 2 in Pregnancy & Parenting Pregnancy

14 answers

Because the instant that the sperm fertilizes the egg, the moment of conception, that baby is given life. Do you ever think about how much of a miracle it is for a child to be conceived!? Several million sperm begin their long journey to that egg and only a few thousand survive. There are several things in a woman's body that is set up to stop those determined sperm from getting to that egg, but for those lucky few people, one (or sometimes 2 or 3) will make it to that egg. Life begins and that baby begins to grow inside his/her mother and settles down in her womb. Growth rapidly increases and in around 9 months a wonderful gift arrives. One could only imagine why some people would want to throw away such a wonderful precious cargo as that. It really boggles my mind how some people could just simply destroy a life without any care in the world. I really don't understand how it is so easy for some people to just get pregnant and throw their baby away when people like my wife and I cannot have children and would love nothing more in this world than to adopt a baby. There are so many people in this world who cannot have children and would love to adopt a child. Yet so many people out there who could care less about other people and rather than be responsible for once in their lives or care for anyone other than themselves by giving those of us who are not capable of having children a chance to fulfil a dream. They just toss their baby out like it was yesterday's trash. What gives them people the right? What makes these people so cruel and heartless. I would love the opportunity to have a baby, a son, a daughter. But some people just don't care. So to answer your question, the truth is, they ARE baby-killers, they are hope-killers, and they are dream-killers. I hope and pray that one day people will wake up and realize that there are better "choices" than slaughtering innocent babies. People could "choose" to allow infertile couples adopt their babies.

btw, allowing yourself to die for your baby to live is not suicide, it is sacrifice. Greater love hath no man than he that would lay down his life for his friend. That is in the Bible and if it is true or a friend, would God hold it any less favorful for a child. I'm sure that any decent parent would sacrifice themselves to save their child, that wouldn't be any different!

2006-11-24 07:11:46 · answer #1 · answered by jjodom1010 3 · 0 2

As for the toddler having withdrawls from the medication, it really is available searching on the dosage. there are diverse drugs that do not commute previous the placenta. i'm certain if women those with optimal cancers might want to have chemo with out it passing in the course of the placenta, optimal anti depressants will be stunning. the topics they situation about passing are topics that bypass by way of your blood. As for the toddler being dependant in a lengthy time period in life, it would make no adventure. it really is like declaring if a mom smokes for the length of being pregnant, which promptly consequences the fetus, that the toddler will be addicted to cigarettes interior the destiny. docs also purely placed moms on anti melancholy if the benifits out weigh the risks. it really is better sensible for a mom to be chuffed and healthful, truly than her being depressed and using her motor motor vehicle off of a bridge, or heavily harming herslef. So I see what you're declaring, yet i don't think it has plenty benefit.

2016-11-29 10:31:42 · answer #2 · answered by brenneman 4 · 0 0

I know it is labeled with fetus for awhile, but from the first day I found out I was pregnant, she was my baby. She had a little heartbeat and everything. That being said, I am pro-choice, except when it is being used as a form of birth control or an "easy out".

2006-11-24 06:58:40 · answer #3 · answered by emmadropit 6 · 1 0

I completely understand you. It is a fetus until it comes out of your body and only then it is a baby. People should look both terms up in the dictionary.
People need to accept that fact that us women have the choice in whether we want an abortion or not. It kills people knowing that we have that power like that.

I have always wondered this though what if someone was so dead set against abortion but then found themselves in a situation were a doctor told them they would die and leave their kids behide if they continued on with the pregnancy, i wonder if they would choose to die? If so then that is suicide and in the bible suicide is a sin.

2006-11-24 07:07:08 · answer #4 · answered by ஐ♥Julian'sMommy♥ஐ 7 · 1 1

because a fetus is still a baby. Why dont you do some research on pro-life advocates instead of being ignorant about the way they think and their reason for doing what they do?

2006-11-24 06:57:30 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

It is open to all the different interpretations that are out there. In my opinion....life begins at conception. That is just how I look at it...when the sperm and egg are fertilize ...life begins!! It makes no difference to me what stage the cells are at or what scientists have named each stage....It is all life to me!!!! I personally am a supporter of pro-choice.
Baby's, toddles,children,teenagers &adults...those are all labels too.
At the end of the day, we all fall under the same category...human.

2006-11-24 07:04:46 · answer #6 · answered by yidlmama 5 · 3 0

THANK YOU!!!!! As for Bessy J there is no need for name calling here let alone foul name calling. You are entitled to your opinion but try doing so without the cursing. For College_m I am sorry that your wife and yourself are unable to bear children but statistics will tell you that women and most likely girls are not releasing their children for adoption but are keeping them. Society bears the expense of a high percentage of these "unplanned" children so the thought of terminating a pregnancy is unjustified for those of us who are sick and tired of children having children.

2006-11-24 19:12:25 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Because if you educate yourself on the life of baby while its in you, it begins to have a heartbeat very very early, and most abortion clinics or doctors who perform abortions do not educate women on what is going on in their bodies. They allow women to make these huge decisions without making them see what is happening inside. Many women I have known said that if they had been shown what the baby looked like at the time they decided to abort they would have changed their minds. We are told to read up on things like cancer and vaccinations and smoking, but when we are eliminating a life that we are building, no one cares. I think its horrible.

2006-11-24 06:58:34 · answer #8 · answered by Soon2BMommy 3 · 1 2

if we want to get high tech, and break it down to science, lets just call an early abortion, riddence of multiplied cells. really.
The whole idea is abserd. I am prochoice and proud.
non of the less I do have my own values and safe zone, and of coarse I dont think abortion is a form of birthcontrol, it should not be used freaquently, because a woman is sexually active and chooses not to protect herself multiple times. but it exsist and is there for those who need it.
baby killer, so should we call it human killing, people killing, fetus killing?
or termiation of cell multiplication. ?

2006-11-24 06:55:29 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

Because is she didn't murder the "fetus" it would become a baby. Regardless of terminology, it is still a human life being destroyed.

2006-11-24 06:57:24 · answer #10 · answered by Sativa 4 · 3 2

fedest.com, questions and answers