DO you think Ross Perot or Ralph Nader will ever decide to re-emerge into politics?

Question

They both had reasonably strong support.

Will we hear from them again politically speaking?

I wonder if they could make a better team by running together on the same ticket? Pres/VP

Thoughts about the subject?

Answer 1

Doubt it seriously. While not a big fan of ole "I got a pie chart!" Ross, I do admire Ralph Nader and believe he is genuine in his concern for the country. Not that Perot isn't concerned, he just came off to me as being a little loopy.

I think the reality is that the big 2 don't want a viable third party in the running. Neither side seems to have workable answers to many of the large scale issues we are facing and will face in the future. Personally, my thought is this. What would it hurt to try a new approach? When you keep doing what you have always done, expect to get what you always got.


Edited: Too dang many viables.

Answer 2

probably Perot. He had no interest in actually prevailing. He grew to become into strictly there to be a spoiler. He left a great variety of followers who extremely believed in him conserving the bag. He provided all kinds of concepts that many human beings concept have been super. None grew to become into functional or perhaps Constitutional. besides the undeniable fact that, human beings new to the political technique are continually interested in such "Pied Pipers". In Nader's case, he's in basic terms yet another narcissist who can not look to get off the degree. Hillary is particularly plenty nevertheless in the race. She is in it to win it. She isn't the reason of your frustration; the technique is. The occasion did a poor job of growing to be the regulations for this first. The ridiculous technique of awading proporional delegates serves just to postpone the technique via helping the two applicants combat mutually as denying the two a victory. *

Answer 3

I had the occasion to meet H. Ross Perot while he was on the 'campaign trail', in a private room with a small group of volunteers. As these young college students asked intelligent questions, Perot answered them directly, intelligently, and wisely. Without the lights and cameras, Perot's demeanor was that of a wise old grandfather giving profound advice. He did not off as "loopy".
Perot would have made a superb president, and the 'career politicans' knew it. He scared the beJesus out of them, and they threatened his daughter's wedding just to shut him up. Had Perot remained steadfast in the 1992 campaign, he would most certainly captured more than 19% of the popular vote, and the United States of America might have returned to being a strong world leader and global peacekeeper that was economically solvent, political moral, and socially stable. Instead, we're mired in the muck of trillion-dollar-debt; amoral, corrupt political leaders; and a society that's more interested in Britney Spears' love life than in the strength of our nation. -RKO-

Answer 4

They are not similar in their politics. Ross Perot is not reemerging into politics. Ralph Nader is always in politics; he's getting old though.

Answer 5

Nader never left.

Nader and Perot together? Well I guess they'd get a lot of publicity. They're both old enough, though, that anyone who likes Nader wouldn't vote for him for president for fear of his dying and leaving Perot to be president, and anyone who likes Perot wouldn't vote for him for president for fear of his dying and leaving Nader as president... who would be president and who would be VP?

Answer 6

Ross Perot will not. But Ralph never stopped. Come to CT. you
might even get to meet him, I have.

Answer 7

No