One thing for sure if you take out Bush you have to take out Cheney . He's the one with his hand up Bush's but making him talk
2006-11-24 06:03:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by Az Rastaman 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
I think impeachment would be a waste of time. The election is the best way to voice your concern over this matter. The people voiced concern over this issue with the last election. The republicans have lost ground, and the left is now up to bat, and we should see if they have any answers. If so we can vote in a deomcratic pres, if not, it will can stick to the right.
I still think it's funny this even comes up. Did vietnam get the president impeached then? This is not the first bad situation we have got in, and even if the facts weren't clear or made up or whatever, he went through the right channels, and the war was approved, no? We can't impeach when we're lied to, or we would probably impeach every president! It's politics, not a moral judgement. Clinton lied, Bush lied, the next president is going to lie. IT'S POLITICS, sadly enough.
2006-11-24 06:18:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by the angry elephant 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
History will deal with Bush and Cheney, the Democrats have bigger fish to fry at the moment...let's see what they can do for Iraq???
What this country REALLY needs is new ideas. The Dem/Rep stuff is really getting old and getting us nowhere. . . personally I've been unaffiliated the last ten years, and am tiring quickly of the people I get to elect...
Since we haven't added one seat to the House of Representatives in the past 100 years, despite the tripling of the population, I'd start there. Jefferson said not to exceed 1/30,000 so now it's `1/700,000 No wonder we feel under-represented and that exclusive club set at 435 decided without a constitutional amendment that no one else gets in...what a field day for the lobbyists...which means the same issues are gone over and over...while the REAL problems the country faces are ignored!!!!!!!!!
Visit the website below...Thomas Jefferson knew and we've let the House get away with way too much!!!!!!!!!!! Including giving the President the right to declare war, which started with Viet Nam.
2006-11-24 07:21:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by imask8r 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
The idea of impeachment is a novelty at best. I'm not a republican or democrat nor am I a big Bush supporter but the idea that we should even waste our time with something so ridiculous is simply funny.
First - I haven't even heard of any real good reason (and no - because you hate him isn't good enough) for impeachment. All I've heard are rants from people that simply hate Bush/Cheney.
Second - Even if for some reason you could find a reason it would be petty and totally distract from the thousands of things our leadership needs to do.
I'm not saying that if a president has done things horribly wrong or found guilty of a meaningful crime he shouldn't be impeached. I'm just saying that the reasons I've heard have been fueled by extremist on the left whose hatred of our president supercedes their common sense.
2006-11-24 07:00:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by seeing_funbelieving 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
I don't know that the new Congress has nearly enough information yet. There won't be automatic impeachment but this President has only informed heads of committees instead of the entire committee or the entire Congress of certain matters. Now that Dems are the committee heads, they will have more information. If GW or Cheney, had an extramarital affair, I could care less but if they have truly disregarded the Congressional role in the balance of power and refuse to "behave"...there would first be a censure anyway.
2006-11-24 06:13:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by Middleclassandnotquiet 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
It's not going to happen. This President went to war with almost 100% backing out of congress. This war has been voted on 3 times and all three times it has passed. There is nothing to impeach for. You can't impeach a president because the liberal press don't like him.
2006-11-24 06:34:10
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
While I'm personally against impeachment at this point in time, those of you who say they have committed no crimes are ridiculous, illegal wiretaps, torture, extraordinary rendition are all criminal acts and impeachable offenses, but impeachment proceedings during a time when our nation is already so severely divided will only increase those divisions and render a tear to the fabric of our nation, I hope the Democrats lead by example and win hearts and minds by be fair minded, just, and acting in our National interests as a whole
2006-11-24 07:02:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Had we had a Democratic controlled congress a year ago I woudl say yes, it's justified. Now I think we just need to tolerate him for the remainder of the dark ages we know as the Bush administration. Iraq is an unforgiveable disaster sold to the American public as a need when, as it turns out, it was one man's want. I don't care about constitutional precendence, if a CEO of a major corporation ran his company the way W runs this nation he'd have been shown the door long ago.
2016-05-22 22:38:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by Stephanie 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
if the repubs did clinton for lieing about sex then bush and cheney are fair game i say go for it the...the dems should start IMPEACHMENT hearings the very first day they are in session and by march of 07 they can have bush removed and cheney also that means pelosi will be president ....hooray
2006-11-24 06:10:42
·
answer #9
·
answered by pokerplayer16101 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
Remember if you impeach Bush-ya got Cheney-leave well enough alone..
2006-11-24 06:20:46
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋