line on this one in support? To me this is beyond partisan and hypocritical...it's nuts. anyone agree with her? Check out the linked video:
http://www.slackernetwork.com/out.php?id=55821
2006-11-24 05:41:33 · 15 answers · asked by Ford Prefect 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Bill O'Really has been vehement about exposing pedophiles are other dangerous people just like Foley, the only difference is that Foley is a powerful Republican (or was) he quit, he was not forced to...in his foul mind, even Foley knew he was wrong.
2006-11-24 05:44:12 · update #1
easy there "Roch cop" , I am not supporting a Democrat by attacking a Republican pedophile or his attack poodle. And I would certainly not support any pedophile no matter what his affiliation. Why don't we all see Foley as a bad guy, and not expand this to other areans and stick to this question. If you want to attack pedophilic Democrats (I'm sure there are some) from 20 years ago go ahead, it's a little harder to make something stick that has already been looked at for 20 years.
2006-11-24 06:26:10 · update #2
Its fun to watch Ann coulter's followers leave her and as they do you see her making more and more outrages statements to stay in the media's eye. This is just another attempt at her trying to get publicity, I doubt that she believes in anything but her own bank account.
2006-11-24 05:48:02 · answer #1 · answered by region50 6 · 3⤊ 4⤋
Ann Coulter is a mild of understanding and certainty in those darkish circumstances of ours. She does, inspite of the undeniable fact that, have a definite wit, tact and humorousness that some (in general Libs) do no longer understand. She became maximum in all probability being sarcastic, as is customary with ol' Ann. are you able to offer a link to the remark or let us know the place it became made? it would help us answer your question.
2016-10-17 11:51:43 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ann is in business to sell her books. She makes Attila The Hun look left wing. I really don't take her seriously, although truthfully, as one who likes willowy blonde women, if she would promise to not speak, I'd take her to dinner. I'm not a Republican, I think some valid points regarding Foley's action after this all came out were made. He handled this right, resigning immediately, but he is, as so many are, a predator in the worst sense. And to remark that he could recover is nonsense to me. I don't buy into it at all. Ann is a shill for the extremists.
2006-11-24 05:50:39 · answer #3 · answered by Rich B 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I'm outraged by all Congressman that try to have sex with their pages. Ann has proven she is a hypocrite and only cares about politics, not doing what is right. As much as she thinks religion is important, she seems to ignore it when it gets in her way.
2006-11-24 09:26:52 · answer #4 · answered by no spam 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Where was your outrage when the entire leadership of the Democratic party was supporting Gerry Studds who was actually having sex with an underaged Congressional Page rather than sending e-mails? They actually went so far as to lower the age limit to legitimixe this sodomite. Your double standards make me sick. The Democrats are the world's biggest hypocrits.
2006-11-24 06:16:58 · answer #5 · answered by ? 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Sounded like she was criticizing the democrats not defending Foley. Democrats actually do support their perverts.
2006-11-24 05:47:25 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
George Stephonopolous defended Clinton lying under oath to a federal grand jury...any dems want to get in? it makes as much sense.
2006-11-24 08:49:58 · answer #7 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
What did Ann Coulter say that wasn't the truth??? That's not defending someone, that is speaking facts.
2006-11-24 05:45:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
Perhaps Foley molested Miss Coulter, thus inspiring him to get the sex change in the first place.
2006-11-24 05:44:07 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
Foley did it, there is no excuse or defense for him. No, I don't agree with her.
2006-11-24 06:12:53 · answer #10 · answered by Ceci 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋