English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Obviously their is nothing in Space. That is why its called Space. All the poisionous gases in Space ,their can't possibly be any form of life., and besides we have all the resources we need here on Earth.

2006-11-24 05:09:12 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Astronomy & Space

12 answers

Hi:

I would like to say that what N.A.S.A spend in space it pays back ten fold Here why:

How many lives are saved because of weather satellites and how it help to plan for droughts

How about satellite T.V. without the communication world wide TV is not possible

Other space probe we sent to the Planets in the Solar system answer some of scientist question How the Earth was formed along with how are Moon get before all we had was theories about it. So we got our money back an than some

Consider the computer you have now use; this would not have been possible without the Space program - Do you know that integrated circuits would have remain a laboratory curiosity had it not been for the Space program because they was market for them and to wire a computer with 25 million wires would have the weight about a ton { remember this was the transistor era}

Do you think the taxpayers got there money out this?

NASA does other things than space, It studies airplane design and airplane crashes to design better planes to be safer and more fuel efficient . Do you think we go our monies worth on this?

So for every dollar spent in Nasa we get 10 dollars back.

2006-11-25 01:46:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

If you're looking for some of the more idealistic answers (exploration and discovery, for example), you can look at the answers above, or the NASA website. But here are some other possibilities:

Fear that, if the US doesn't exploit space, another country will, putting the US at a disadvantage. This was especially true during the cold war.

Pork barrel politics: NASA centers are located many locations in various states, including California, Virginia, Ohio, New York, Maryland, West Virginia, Mississippi, Alabama, Texas, Louisiana, New Mexico, and Florida. The local communities that support these facilities elect representatives to Congress that support continued funding. The same thing happens with military bases and BRAC.

A belief, based in Keynesian economics, that government spending stimulates the economy.

Of course, it is true that many useful discoveries and inventions have come from space spending. My favorite is the geosynchronous communications satellite, which helps facilitate international commerce (and lets me listen to Howard Stern, even though the FCC shut him out of ground-based radio).

2006-11-24 07:03:46 · answer #2 · answered by Michel_le_Logique 4 · 1 1

You should do your research before you come to your conclusions because you do not realize that the space program has made countless contributions to life right here on Earth. The space program in general is the reason why you can use the internet right now, a cell phone, know the weather forecast for ten days or longer, can see which storm is heading your way, effect how your car, house, life insurance rates are calculated, let's your government know which enemies are doing suspicious things with their military, who might be testing nuclear missles, you have velcro because of the space program, and also numerous other materials that have contributed to your personal saftey and on and on and on.

And for your information, space is not empty. There are places to explorer of the likes which you can't even imagine. We have found the building blocks of life in space and we have more reason than not to believe that life exists elsewhere than our own planet. The space program helps advance the human race in general. Without it the world would be a very different place.

2006-11-24 17:12:06 · answer #3 · answered by minuteblue 6 · 0 1

Because people like you have determined that progress is not important, and there are a lot of you, and your resistance to progress creates a small demand. Simple economics. People who seem to think that Earth will last forever and that the resources here are unlimited obviously have never picked up an atlas and looked at it. We will eventually run out of gas, room, and food. Simple as that. There will be too many people for the planet to support, and when that happens we will be faced with only a few choices.

1. Starve until the population is more manageable

2. Genocide. Yay, aren't we doing that already?

3. Get off this rock and move into space, where as you yourself have pointed out, there is lots of space.

Why do they spend the money? Because there are (thank goodness) a few people who understand that eventually we will need to know all we can about space because we will likely have to move there.

Why does it cost so much? Because people like you want to spen their time watching reality TV instead of learning about science and technology. It's just not fun, and you want fun! World peace and jobs for everyone, but you haven't the foggiest inkling that in a growing technology based world economy the best way to get a job is to get an education and come up with ways to build and expand and get into space because that's where the jobs are! It costs so much because it requires careful planning, lots of education, and requires the development of materials that can withstand the rigours of space.

Materials which, by the way, you enjoy on a daily basis. Like your computer.

Sorry, but I live in a shop town where people get paid ungodly amounts of money to sit all day and stamp parts where a robot could do it better and cheaper, and free that person to create a better robot.

Nothing in space? Poisonous gasses? You are obviously one of those who feel that education is beneath you and you'd rather play video games and watch jacka** II than actually DO anything with your day.

Go pick a book up and read it.

2006-11-24 05:56:05 · answer #4 · answered by ~XenoFluX 3 · 2 2

i could think of that internet hosting the Olympics provided super quantities of jobs - a minimum of on a non everlasting foundation. I propose all that shape had to be finished with the aid of somebody. Plus each and all the workers just to maintain issues working. If not something this positioned money into flow. I propose, an financial gadget is all on the subject of the stream of money isn't it? From the customers to the shops, from the shops to the businesses, and from the businesses back to the customers they hire. around and around. From what I understand the Olympics are hosted in a community that fluctuate into notoriously run down and skipped over. Even after the Olympics are over it's going to stay fairly of a vacationer charm for years yet to come back, besides as with a bit of luck substitute right into a greater eye-catching area for housing and shops? in case you seem at China, they taken care of the Olympics as a style of huge residing brochure for travelers and corporation opportunities. I doubt they offered adequate of those remarkable little mascot plushies to pay for the final public of the form, not to show the fee of working the Olympics. whether, in the event that they have been hoping to inspire extra tourism into China, besides as attempt to entice new corporation opportunities. those are what pay for the Olympics. not, advertising keychains and frozen lemonade that's how previous US cities controlled to make a income...

2016-10-13 00:56:37 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

NASA's money isn't spent in space, you dolt. It's spent on earth, where it produces jobs and stimulates the economy. NASA projects cost a fraction of what is being spent on pointless, unwinnable wars by the current government, and produce infinitely more in the way of valuable ideas and products.

And your idea of the reality of space and what is out there is absolutely clueless. Go to the library!

2006-11-24 12:12:51 · answer #6 · answered by aviophage 7 · 0 1

Please, do some research about space. There are billions of other stars that could have planets supporting life orbiting them. There could easily be other lifeforms. There could even be primitive life in our own solar system. Most of humanity is curious about what is out there. It is doubtful that we have "all the resources we need" now, and even so, they wont last forever. Also, sorry to break it to you, but NASA is good for the economy, not bad.

2006-11-24 05:20:45 · answer #7 · answered by The Wired 4 · 3 1

There's nothing in space - but there's poisonous gas in space? And why should we answer a question from someone who feels educated enough to make comments on the budget, but doesn't know the difference between 'there' and 'their'?

In short - for every dollar NASA gets in it's budget, seven dollars are spent in our economy as a result. If nothing else (since you obviously have no intellectual curiousity whatsoever), it's good for the economy.

2006-11-24 05:54:20 · answer #8 · answered by eri 7 · 2 2

Billions of tax payers $$

Why doesn't the US stop unnecesary wars and meddling in other people's affairs ? What about the expenses in Iraq ? Why must Science suffer ? Where were you when your countrymen were walking on the Moon ? Were you concerned about yor money then ?

2006-11-24 05:36:10 · answer #9 · answered by ag_iitkgp 7 · 3 1

Why are they spending a billion dollars a day in the middle east killing people and achieving NOTHING But pain and grief.

There is a difference between waste through ignorance and waste through curiousity.

2006-11-24 09:17:42 · answer #10 · answered by aorton27 3 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers