Stumps at Day 3
Australia 181/1
Lead of over 620 runs
Don't know why they didn't enforce the follow-on despite having a lead of over 400 runs.
Langer and Ponting were at the crease.
Hayden was run-out for 37, I guess.
England were all out for a mediocre 157 thanks to a six-for from the old war horse Glenn McGrath, his figures reading 6/50. Three wickets for Stuart Clark and 1 for Lee.
No addition to Warne's tally of 685 wickets, at least for now.
2006-11-24 19:57:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by Shodan 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
England 53 for 3
2006-11-24 10:14:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by ash3_phoenix 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Australia 602 for 9 declared and England 53 for 3.
2006-11-24 05:25:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by vaibhav d 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
England were all out for 157 runs in 61.1 overs. Australia did not enforce the follow-on and decided to bat. When answering this question, Australia are 54 runs for No loss in 10 overs
2006-11-24 16:19:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by vakayil k 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
in basic terms area of the pre-recreation ideas video games and drumming up coverage of the sequence i could think of. the only heat up in England against Somerset substitute into in all probability inadequate, yet that fluctuate into as lots as a results of relatives commitments particularly than any duplicity on the area of the ECB. Dare I propose T20 interfering with the try coaching - you could not have issues the two techniques? At Anil Kumble's request, one greater heat up substitute into scheduled at Manuka Oval in Canberra formerly the Australian try sequence. the comparable venue hosted the journey as area of a Sheffield shelter and Ryobi cup "pageant" over December and January. Manuka performs quickly, bouncy and real, such as the main perfect venues. Kumble suggested the venue because of the fact the top of the joint working committee, so no question of the venue being a unilateral decision. Suspect it somewhat is greater hype than substance. It wasn't the music that fee India the britain and Australian assessments, it substitute into the lack of a respected attack (as i've got pronounced formerly, you pick a impressive pair of bowlers, in those sequence India struggled to discover even one). The absence of a good pairing would nonetheless chew you this sequence. it is going to likely be an exciting journey.
2016-10-13 00:54:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
england 53 for 3.
2006-11-24 12:46:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Australia 602/9d & 202/1d
England 157 & 370 (100.1 ov)
Australia won by 277 runs
2006-11-26 23:24:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by Shashang_99 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
england 53/3 wicket
2006-11-24 09:10:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by IMMY 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
i am not sure but i know englands target is 648 and now their scorev is somewhre in 168 for 5 or something like that. i am sure that australia is winning the first an southafrica is winning the third match on sunday,26th november 2006 in durban. give me best answer please!!!
2006-11-25 17:33:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by declan 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
aus 9 decl - 602
england 5-83
ian bell23
geraint jones 2
drinks day 3
2006-11-24 12:04:53
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋