For god's sake he only missed a penalty! He's scored plenty of important goals this season. Look at rooney after his lean spell, he's firing on all cylinders, and saha will again too
2006-11-24 08:28:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would say Ruud is a better player than Saha but it seems to be Saha is a better foil to Rooney and brings the best out of Wayne..
2006-11-24 12:22:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
just out of interest have you watched saha off the ball, his work rate is phenominal. try not to judge him on goals and missed penaltys. MY total faith is with sir alex and his sometimes arrogant decisions, may united be with you.
2006-11-24 12:44:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
We have no other strikers unless he moves Ronaldo, Giggs or scholes up there.
But who cares who scores lets just get the 3 points.
2006-11-24 14:07:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by richard_beckham2001 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
i think the problem with manchester is that they dont have depth in terms of strikers, even if he is not worth his place, who else can they play, they only have him, rooney, and solskjear and ronaldo is not evena striker and they want to loan out smith. wait until he gets injured for a lengthy spell, ask aresnal, they have been taught to have depth in their team by the occurance of injuries, they have utility players like baptista, walcot, out and out strikers like henry, van persie, adebayor, aliedierre and they dont need to worry.
2006-11-24 14:08:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by BV 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
of course he is he had one bad game keep off his back and he will do the biz with chelsea. no worrys with the lad.
2006-11-24 12:46:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by Deano™ 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
is there anybody else to play there???? alan smith????
surely ROONEY cant play there since he plays VERY DEEP more like a midfielder
2006-11-24 12:21:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by livefootball 1
·
0⤊
0⤋