I've never seen the Quakers on any terrorist lists. Are you sure you have this right?
2006-11-24 04:49:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by yupchagee 7
·
15⤊
0⤋
America is under Marshall Law meaning the 'constitutuion' is no longer in effect.
Wake up folks. You only have until Jan 14 to get out of America before you will be prohibited from leaving or entering. There is going to be a lock down of at least 35-45% of the people in America.
http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/64
2006-11-24 04:46:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Number one, putting someone on a list it not making a law.
Number two, a source or link would be handy to refer to.
Number three, being on someone's watchlist is no big deal. Before I matured and enlisted in the military, I was photographed by FBI agents and had my name and other information recorded for being involved in a protest rally. I received a top secret security clearance a year and a half later. Big deal.
2006-11-24 04:35:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by Rich B 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
What law puts them on a terror watch list? Islamic people are on that list and Islam is not outlawed. Being a Quaker is not outlawed because they are on a list. That question doesn't even make sense.
2006-11-24 04:20:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by matt b 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Convoluted question alert. What law was passed about Quakers? I fail to see any here.
2006-11-24 04:42:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by netnazivictim 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well just because someone claims religous rights doesn't mean that they can break the law (ie Warren Jeffs and his child rape case, Satanists murdering because their religion says it's OK).
2006-11-24 04:45:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by El Bubba 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think the federal government is a bloated thing to fear.
It is no surprise, they watch everything.
2006-11-24 04:18:21
·
answer #7
·
answered by Perplexed 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
What difference does it make. The CIA can not function in-country.
2006-11-24 04:20:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by hunterentertainment 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Absolute power corrupts absolutely!
2006-11-24 04:19:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Is this a new Pelosi policy?
2006-11-24 04:27:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋