well as a man of my culture i honesty think he's not how and the hell can you go around smiling and caring on when you ex wife either one dont make any diffrencedont he care abotu how his c hildren feel hes not even speaking out or putting out a reward for any information to who the persons or person killed his wife he palying golf and going aroud smilling on the radio trying to write a book trying to go for interviews on tv dont make no sice he should be grieving for his kids loss yea he did it go aroung like that sure did god rest john cockeren soul but oj is lucky to have him as a lawyer but hes not innocent
2006-11-24 03:50:57 · 21 answers · asked by mcgloson@sbcglobal.net 2 in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
No.
2006-11-24 03:52:42 · answer #1 · answered by joe_k125 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
OJ was thoroughly investigated, tried in court and had the evidence evaluated by a jury who found him "not guilty" of this crime. He has always maintained his innocence of this deed and he wrote a theoretical book (which does not contain a confession). Money was probably the motivation in writing the book as there is a civil suit debt and a need to provide an inheritance for his children etc. The trial attorney's Cochran, Marcia and Darden wrote their own books and received millions.
A few things that the jury may have considered:
-The investigator who found the glove later committed PERJURY regarding his extreme racist comments.
- Another investigator took a vial sample of OJ's blood from the lab and carried it INTO the crime scene.
- The glove DID NOT fit OJ's hand.
- There never was the amount of blood on OJ's body, clothes, house or car CONSISTENT with someone who had committed that crime in person..
- The murder weapon was NEVER connected to him or found.
- The jury was taken to visit OJ's house and DID NOT see a large blood trail.
- There were no witnesses to the actual crime.
- Likely the jury found him innocent because there was a LACK of real evidence to convict.
Some may disagree with the verdict but it's unfair for them to blatantly say with a certainty that this man is guilty.
At times a publisher controls the general content and even the title of a book which an author must agree to if he needs the contract.
2006-11-25 01:15:40 · answer #2 · answered by sunshine25 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No he is not innocent. No, the court did not find him innocent..it was the 12 people of his 'peers.' That is so scary. Why don't most blacks think that black people are guilty of crimes? I watched every day of the trial. Except one..and I made my cable company credit me with 75 cents the day the cable went off! Anyway.....I saw everything. Yes, the cops made mistakes, shame on them. But why couldn't the jury see how guilty the man was? That was a hate crime. This upsets me. Just as the blacks I know will cover up for other blacks when a crime has been committed on them! I just don't understand their thinking. Do they think they are protecting one another? They aren't doing themselves nor anyone else a favor by doing that.
The man is a has been...and never will be anything ever again. I remember him saying he would spend the rest of his days trying to find the 'real' killer. Just shows what a liar he is. I feal sorry for his kids. They are caught in the middle of all this.
2006-11-24 04:13:48 · answer #3 · answered by TexasRose 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The courts found him innocent and now he is free to live his life. I do not say I agreed with the decision of the court but I feel the less attention the man receives the better the country would be.
I will not buy his book neither listen to any program he is on.
Ignore the man and maybe he will get the message and crawl into a hole where he belongs.
2006-11-24 04:00:01 · answer #4 · answered by Molly 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Do you advise "or responsible?" and also you skipped over Asian. There are purely 3 races so that you made it tougher for no longer something. Oh, and there is not any hyphen in African American. And African American isn't a race. responsible, black.
2016-11-29 10:26:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would just like the man and his name to disappear from the media. I don't want to hear anymore about him.
2006-11-24 03:59:03 · answer #6 · answered by Scoots 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I just saw a pig fly over here and it's fine for strange global pop stars to sleep with children as well?????????????????????
2006-11-24 03:58:20 · answer #7 · answered by Sean G 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Do you think that the sun is full of ice cubes?
2006-11-24 03:56:50 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
he did it...he knows he did it, the cops knew he did it, johnnie cochran knew he did it, God knows he did it, and if his kids don't know by now that he did it, they will figure it out...i hope it DOESN'T happen, but it wouldn't surprise me if one day his kids surprise him at about 0300 with a 12 gauge...like i said, i hope it DOESN'T happen...i hope his next wife is lorena bobbit
2006-11-25 10:48:25 · answer #9 · answered by spike missing debra m 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I'm not sure, as bad as those people were sliced up, it seems he would have been a mess himself that would have been hard to get completely off
2006-11-24 03:58:26 · answer #10 · answered by treetown2 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
No way! I believe he did it. They found his glove, his bloody shoe print and his hair. How could he not have done it????
2006-11-24 04:37:39 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋